Ana Padovana

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shared intentionality (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shared intentionality and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:47, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Ana Padovana! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:47, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shared intentionality

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Shared intentionality requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.lidsen.com/journals/neurobiology/neurobiology-07-01-156. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ––FormalDude (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Since the plagiarized content was from a free source, I've instead attributed the copied text back to the source. This is an edge case; in general, please refrain from copying wholesale in Wikipedia, as most sources will not allow it and the article will be speedily deleted. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 16:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shared intentionality (September 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought, see WP:FORUM. New terms or principles must be established elsewhere. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Dear Johannes Maximilian,

I believe, the article's rejection happened due to a misunderstanding: this article does not introduce a new concept or original thought; shared intentionality is not a new psychological construct. To my knowledge, this concept is generally accepted in cognitive sciences. Dr. Michael Tomasello received the David Rumelhart Prize 2022 (https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/rumelhart-prize/ , this is the prestigious prize in the Cognitive Science Society) as an award for his insights into cognition evolution and, specifically, the knowledge development about a contribution of shared intentionality to cognition and social reality formation. Rigorous academic journal Frontiers in Psychology recently published special research topic dedicated to shared intentionality (https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/35928/exploring-shared-intentionality-underlying-mechanisms-evolutionary-roots-developmental-trajectories-and-cultural-influences). I also modified the article for showing the state of the art in this field.

Looking forward your kind reply.

Best regards,

Ana Ana Padovana (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

My article "Shared intentionality" provided citations of reliable sources needed to demonstrate that the material is verifiable, and not merely my opinion.

You can also find more information in reliable sources about shared intentionality:

Fishburn FA, Murty VP, Hlutkowsky CO, MacGillivray CE, Bemis LM, Murphy ME, Huppert TJ, Perlman SB. Putting our heads together: interpersonal neural synchronization as a biological mechanism for shared intentionality. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. 2018 Aug;13(8):841-9.

Astolfi L. et al.: Neuroelectrical hyperscanning measures simultaneous brain activity in humans". Brain Topogr, 2010;23:243–256.

Szymanski C. et al.: Teams on the same wavelength perform better: Inter-brain phase synchronization constitutes a neural substrate for social facilitation". Neuroimage, 2017;15:425–436.

Hu, Y. et al.: Inter-brain synchrony and cooperation context in interactive decision making". Biol Psychol, 2018;133: 54–62, 2018.

Painter DR, Kim JJ, Renton AI, Mattingley JB. Joint control of visually guided actions involves concordant increases in behavioural and neural coupling. Communications biology. 2021;4(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02319-3.

Liu, J., Zhang, R., Xie, E. et al. Shared intentionality modulates interpersonal neural synchronization at the establishment of communication system. Commun Biol 6, 832 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05197-z

Atmaca S, Sebanz N, Prinz W, Knoblich G. Action co-representation: The joint SNARC effect. Social Neuroscience 2008;3:3-4, 410-420. DOI: 10.1080/17470910801900908.

Shteynberg G, Galinsky AD. Implicit coordination: Sharing goals with similar others intensifies goal pursuit, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2011;47: 1291-1294, ISSN 0022-1031, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.012.

McClung, JS, Placì S, Bangerter A, Clément F, Bshary R. The language of cooperation: shared intentionality drives variation in helping as a function of group membership. Proc. R. Soc. B 2017;284:20171682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1682.

Tang N, Gong S, Zhao M, Gu C, Zhou J, Shen M, Gao T. Exploring an imagined “we” in human collective hunting: Joint commitment within shared intentionality. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society 2022;44(44). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3wj722pb.

Please let me know How can I appeal this case? Ana Padovana (talk) 09:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shared intentionality (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shared intentionality and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shared intentionality has been accepted

Shared intentionality, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ana Padovana! Your additions to Knowledge transfer have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello Diannaa, thanks for informing about this issue. I will keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues. I understand well that the copyright and plagiarism issues are crucial in publishing and editing.

To clarify, if I understand well from the final version of your editing in the Knowledge transfer article on 4th February 2024, you removed the content (which cited Blackler, 1995) that was not published by me while I only moved it from one section to another in the Knowledge transfer article due to a structural optimization of this article. So, this content (cited Blackler, 1995) was not mine (i did not add it), it was not my addition that you removed because of the copyright and plagiarism issues. Whether I understand well that you only removed Blackler (1995) or not? Sorry if I misunderstood.

Would you be so kind to advise me, should I check for plagiarism only the content that I add or also the content that has already been previously published in WP by other editors?

Thank you for your help! Ana Padovana (talk) 06:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Here is a link to the CopyPatrol report. Click on the iThenticate link to view what was found by the detection service. I have checked back in the page history using the phrase "appurtenant translation rules" and the girst time it appears in the article was when you added it. So it does appear that it was indeed you who added the copyright content. — Diannaa (talk) 11:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Due to misunderstanding, in my letter, I only mentioned the content of (Blackler, 1995) from removed copyright content copied from http://www.shawmultimedia.com/integrate.html , which was not my addition. From all the incorrect content, my mistake was only the added text from the article by Rovik (2016). "Knowledge Transfer as Translation: Review and Elements of an Instrumental Theory" from the International Journal of Management Reviews (Open access journal). Unfortunately, I submitted a draft (previous version) that still needed rewriting. Sorry for my mistake. Further, i will keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues. I understand well that the copyright and plagiarism are crucial issues. Thank you for your help! Have a nice day! Ana Padovana (talk) 13:14, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

WP:PROPORTION and other concerns

Thanks for adding the page numbers. I'm sorry that I have to revert your addition again but there are various issues with it. One general issue that was also present in many of your previous contributions is WP:PROPORTION. Wikipedia articles on very general topics like Mind should focus on the main topic and not get lost in overly specific details. Just because you can find one source that mentions externalism somewhere and then goes on to discuss how shared intentionality affects the nervous system structure in an embryo does not mean that a paragraph or a section should be dedicated to this topic if overview sources on externalism about mind do not mention this.

More specifically, you have to be careful about what your sources actually say. For example, the very first sentence of your addition is not supported by your source (Ezequiel A Di Paolo; Marieke Rhohde; Hanne De Jaegher (2014). "Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play"). The source does not talk about externalism about mind and its discussion of how organisms make sense of their environment (page 39) is not connected to this theory.

It is very difficult to make contributions to very general articles by relying on sources that are specialized on a very narrow topic. For example, Val Danilov, I. (2023). "Low-Frequency Oscillations for Nonlocal Neuronal Coupling in Shared Intentionality Before and After Birth: Toward the Origin of Perception." is about a completely different topic and nowhere discusses externalism about mind. I would suggest that you focus on making contributions to articles on more narrow topics that are in the actual scope of the sources. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

I agree on all accounts, but please don't give up on contributing to such profound and exciting topics, Ana! Maybe you could use Mind's Talk page to draft, thus empowering others to help you tease out concepts if needed?? :) Little cap (talk) 12:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the kind advices. Best regards, Ana Padovana (talk) 18:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intenzionalità condivisa (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intenzionalità condivisa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 12:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)