Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the The Religious of Nazareth article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

It looks like you may have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Please do not add such material without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi. The layout, style and lack of wiki links often point to cut-and-pastes of existing text. A quick Google search verified that this is indeed original content; my apologies for the error. However, it reads like an essay instead of an encyclopedia article. It also lacks citations as to the importance of the organization. It may be even be deleted as an ad. I won't delete it again, but I will tag it with some alerts so that other editors might help clean things up. WP:YFA can explain more. Again, sorry about the mixup. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply