Ameriwikipedian
sockpuppet investigation launched. Do not bother to reply to this post. HLGallon (talk) 12:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Ameriwikipedian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'd like to request an unblock please. According to the investigation, the evidence that blocked me is based off the Checkuser - essentially an IP tracker (which wouldn't have matched any of the accounts), and the Editor Interaction Utility - which monitors two or more accounts that visit a certain page, something that can be highly coincidental with over 300 million viewers. To the admin who views this: I'm not trying to come off as rude by any means, but I haven't received anything short of that from anyone else thus far and I haven't done anything wrong. I've had the account for less than a month and I'm already being accused of being someone I'm not and have no way of proving I'm me. Ameriwikipedian (talk) 23:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Behavioral evidence coupled with checkuser evidence makes it pretty clear you are still attempting to evade a block.OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I just created this account with less than ten edits under my belt. What behavioral evidence could I have possibly created out of curiosity, Ohnoitsjamie? I should have the right to be presented with this evidence - not be provided a link that shows no connection between me and the other accounts and expect me to accept that. Ameriwikipedian (talk) 04:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)}}