July 2021 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Topal Osman. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Alexander Leone (talk) 20:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Topal Osman. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

31 Alexander Leone (talk) 16:32, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Semsûrî (talk) 16:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 2021 edit

  This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) (Stupidity by me) 16:27, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

What!? Other wiki editor delete my contents from his age and after delete his content from my page,this is unequal Alexander Leone (talk) 16:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

And nice username bro 😜 Alexander Leone (talk) 16:42, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. However, removing something that is sourced and saying the source provided no information makes no sense. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) (Stupidity by me) 16:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Khojaly (town). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 18:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 16:09, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply