Welcome! edit

Hello, Akhilrajendra, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Akhilrajendra/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! hiàn 23:00, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Akhilrajendra/sandbox edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:Akhilrajendra/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. hiàn 23:00, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nathan2055 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 08:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Akhilrajendra! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nathan2055talk - contribs 08:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Akhilrajendra/sandbox edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Akhilrajendra/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nathan2055talk - contribs 08:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Akhilrajendra/sandbox edit

 

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Akhilrajendra/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nathan2055talk - contribs 04:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Well this page must not be deleted as I am its genuine user akhilrajendra and the page Akhil Rajendra is about me, my profile is not added properly was the reason I was trying to update same with my unskilled hands on wikipedia and don't know what went wrong there.

My written book is released last week titled DECODING THE GOD AND THE RELIGION -Volume-1, with M/s Leadstart Publishing , which is internationally available with following links:


https://www.amazon.in/Decoding-God-Religion-Akhil-Rajendra/dp/9390266769/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=9789390266760&qid=1600145358&sr=8-1

For International Print Copy Orders:-

USA - https://www.amazon.com/dp/9390266769 UK- https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/9390266769 GERMANY- https://www.amazon.de/dp/9390266769 FRANCE- https://www.amazon.fr/dp/9390266769 SPAIN- https://www.amazon.es/dp/9390266769 ITALY- https://www.amazon.it/dp/9390266769 JAPAN- https://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/9390266769 CANADA- https://www.amazon.ca/dp/9390266769

All the information given there was correct and I can present the verification as well.

Kindly update the page back to what it was updated from mysids.

Thanks

My Wikipedia user name is blocked and page is set for speedy deletion edit

Dear Sir/Madam,


As you have blocked my username akhilrajendra on wikipedia, and my page is set for speedy deletion, I have the following appeal.


Well this page must not be deleted as I am its genuine user akhilrajendra and the page Akhil Rajendra is about me, my profile is not added properly was the reason I was trying to update same with my unskilled hands on wikipedia and don't know what went wrong there. My written book is released last week titled DECODING THE GOD AND THE RELIGION -Volume-1, with M/s Leadstart Publishing , which is internationally available with following links:


https://www.amazon.in/Decoding-God-Religion-Akhil-Rajendra/dp/9390266769/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=9789390266760&qid=1600145358&sr=8-1

For International Print Copy Orders:-

USA - https://www.amazon.com/dp/9390266769 UK- https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/9390266769 GERMANY- https://www.amazon.de/dp/9390266769 FRANCE- https://www.amazon.fr/dp/9390266769 SPAIN- https://www.amazon.es/dp/9390266769 ITALY- https://www.amazon.it/dp/9390266769 JAPAN- https://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/9390266769 CANADA- https://www.amazon.ca/dp/9390266769

All the information given there was correct, as on various other websites as imdb and google, and I can present the verifications as well.



Kindly update the page back to what it was updated from my side and unblock me editing. Akhilrajendra (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

My Wikipedia page and udername edit

Dear Sir/Madam,


As you have blocked my username akhilrajendra on wikipedia, and my page is set for speedy deletion, I have the following appeal.


Well this page must not be deleted as I am its genuine user akhilrajendra and the page Akhil Rajendra is about me, my profile is not added properly was the reason I was trying to update same with my unskilled hands on wikipedia and don't know what went wrong there. My written book is released last week titled DECODING THE GOD AND THE RELIGION -Volume-1, with M/s Leadstart Publishing , which is internationally available with following links:


https://www.amazon.in/Decoding-God-Religion-Akhil-Rajendra/dp/9390266769/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=9789390266760&qid=1600145358&sr=8-1

For International Print Copy Orders:-

USA - https://www.amazon.com/dp/9390266769 UK- https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/9390266769 GERMANY- https://www.amazon.de/dp/9390266769 FRANCE- https://www.amazon.fr/dp/9390266769 SPAIN- https://www.amazon.es/dp/9390266769 ITALY- https://www.amazon.it/dp/9390266769 JAPAN- https://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/9390266769 CANADA- https://www.amazon.ca/dp/9390266769

All the information given there was correct, as on various other websites as imdb and google, and I can present the verifications as well.



Kindly unblock and update the page back to what it was updated from my side. Akhilrajendra (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akhilrajendra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am yet to learn the functioning of wikipedia, if I erred ...will not be repeated

Decline reason:

This does not address your violations of WP:SOCK. In fact, it raises additional concerns, as it appears you have been violating WP:COI and WP:PROMO, too. Yamla (talk) 10:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reason respected HickoryOughtShirt?4 gave for blocking my account is given as THIS ACCOUNT IS BLOCKED INDEFINITELY FROM EDITING WIKIPEDIA BECAUSE THE USERNAME MATCHES THE NAM OF A WELL-KNOWN LIVING PERSON , Now this in absolute contradiction of the reason he gave for deletion of the page WP:SOCK WP:COI and WP:PROMO.

The reasons given here as grievences and purely appeals with grievances, there is no such intent or any such action of mis-using wikipedia and nether history of doing so in past, for which the accounts are getting blocked, IP addresses are getting blocked. Expecting a little bit of understanding our grievences and our genuine efforts of restoring the page Akhil Rajendra from deletion and unblocking the accounts, which in future are going to be of usage of wikipedia.


Sir, WP:GNG as discussed above, following are the links from reliable news papers if amazon where my written book is among top selling in one category is not considered reliable.

https://www.mid-day.com/articles/bollywood-actress-daisy-shah-to-debut-on-stage-in-new-play/17391171

https://www.mumbaitheatreguide.com/dramas/Articles/16/jun/daisy-shah-debuts-on-stage-with-begum-jaan.asp

https://www.mid-day.com/photos/photos-salman-khan-sneha-ullal-watch-daisy-shahs-play-begum-jaan/10538


https://www.india.com/photos/entertainment/awww-salman-khan-attends-premiere-of-friend-daisy-shahs-debut-play-begum-jaan-72918/daisy-shah-performing-during-the-premiere-of-her-debut-play-72935/

https://www.pressreader.com/india/mid-day/20160710/282406988681785


Also I would mention here again that, these were our efforts to get the username UNBLOCKED and stop the page Akhil Rajendra from the delation by sending more and more explanations, we never ever had any intention of misusing wikipedia and we need did it in past. We are nor expert as yet on wikipedia, but learning the practices of is guidelines. Requesting you to not to delete the page and unblock the accounts and IP addresses.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akhilrajendra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. only (talk) 14:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akhilrajendra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

1- I was not aware about the editing norms on wikipedia, this blocking surely has helped me to learn and understand. 2- In past I never ever misused wikipedia and do not intent in future as well 3- I am responsible using and willing to contribute on wikipedia

Decline reason:

You evaded your block just a week ago. You are still not following the policy, nor do I trust you to. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.