User talk:Aiman abmajid/Archive 5

Nomination for deletion of Template:RSA-OBR facilities edit

 Template:RSA-OBR facilities has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979  18:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

It has now been moved to User:Aiman abmajid/RSA-OBR facilities, in case you wish to merge any of it with a more general infobox. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:16, 7 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Infobox consolidation edit

Members of WP:HWY, the global project for Highway articles on the English Wikipedia, have been working to consolidate all of the different infobox templates together. You may have noticed that already from several articles that now use {{infobox road}}. There is a second, companion template: {{infobox road junction}} that has also been updated. Both templates will use the same meta template to control the color of the headers inside the infobox, based on country, roadway type or some combination of the two. The two templates comply with color-usage restrictions in WP:COLOR, Wikipedia's section of the Manual of Style concerning Accessibility. If you have any concerns over how the templates are being used and would like changes made, please let us know. As of right now though, most of the templates you had created fail those Accessibility guidelines, which is why they've been consolidated into the one template. With as many as 80 separate templates at one time to make infoboxes for highway articles, it was felt that updating a few master templates to handle all the highway articles in the world would be simpler than redesigning the 80 templates. Imzadi 1979  18:33, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Template:Malaysia state road routebox edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Malaysia state road routebox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Imzadi 1979  10:18, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Template:Malaysia municipal road routebox edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Malaysia municipal road routebox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Imzadi 1979  11:18, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Template:Malaysia road routebox edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Malaysia road routebox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Imzadi 1979  22:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Highways of the Malaysian Federal Route 175 edit

 Template:Highways of the Malaysian Federal Route 175 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979  05:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

To this nomination, the following templates were added:
Feel free to comment on the nomination if you wish. Imzadi 1979  05:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Johor Bahru Interchange edit

 

The article Johor Bahru Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable road junction

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nuttah (talk) 14:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:McDonalds signs edit

 Template:McDonalds signs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sultan Muhammad Faris Petra of Kelantan edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Sultan Muhammad Faris Petra of Kelantan. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Aiman, Earlier this year the community decided that all new biographies of Living People must have a source. As you are still creating unreferenced BLPs I'm afraid I've had to remove your wp:Autopatrolled flag as that has made it difficult for newpage patrollers to spot your new articles and tag them for referencing or deletion. We really appreciate your contributions, and if you would just start citing your sources I, or would hope any admin at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled will happily restore that flag. Cheers ϢereSpielChequers 11:12, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Correction of Asian Highway AH2 alignment in Malaysia edit

Greetings,

Recently I have read the Malaysian and Singaporean sectional database of AH2 and corrected the main article of Malaysian Expressway System. If you are free, please help me to correct the related routes.

According to UNESCAP, the AH2 alignment in Malaysia is like this:-

The southern part from Senai North onwards is currenly being disputed because Singapore claims the AH2 route alignment to be from the causeway to Bukit Timah Expressway towards Anak Bukit Interchange. Thank you. - Hezery99 (talk) 13:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Elyas Omar edit

 

The article Elyas Omar has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 22:23, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Yaacob Latiff edit

 

The article Yaacob Latiff has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 22:45, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kelab Golf Negara Subang edit

 

The article Kelab Golf Negara Subang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since 2006 micro stub - notability issues also?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kelab Golf Perkhidmatan Awam edit

 

The article Kelab Golf Perkhidmatan Awam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since 2006 micro stub - also notability issues?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:24, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

1975 AIA building hostage crisis edit

Hello, my friend: A group of us are working on clearing the backlog at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Articles_lacking_sources_from_October_2006. The article in the above header has been without sources for the past four years and may be removed if none are added. I wonder if you can help do so. Sincerely, and all the best to you, GeorgeLouis (talk) 02:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jambatan Permatang Bendahari edit

 

The article Jambatan Permatang Bendahari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for this subject as either name, Fails WP:V and WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:31, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Motorcycle shelter for deletion edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article Motorcycle shelter, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorcycle shelter until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Biker Biker (talk) 08:42, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Alor Setar North Interchange edit

 

The article Alor Setar North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  03:12, 30 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

An Invite to join the Highways WikiProject edit

   
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Highways - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hi, Aiman abmajid, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the International Highways WikiProject and its new regional taskforces! The Highways WikiProject is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, or anything related to International Roads. This includes supporting existing regional road WikiProjects and fostering the development of new international highway WikiProjects. We have recently created five regional task forces focused on Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania and Latin America.

To improve road and highway articles, here are guidelines for B class criteria. Please add any higher GA, FA quality articles to the international roads portal. Also, please help out by inviting new or unfamiliar editors with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/New articles/Invite template.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

JCbot (talk) 01:51, 4 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

South Klang Valley Expressway interchange listed at Redirects for discussion edit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect South Klang Valley Expressway interchange. Since you had some involvement with the South Klang Valley Expressway interchange redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 14:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Malaysia edit

  The Editor's Barnstar
For recognition of work on Malaysia. SilkTork *YES! 14:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is a very useful, readable and professionally presented article. One of the best articles I've encountered. Now get working on building up other articles. Well done. SilkTork *YES! 14:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Changlun Interchange edit

 

The article Changlun Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  03:18, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jitra North Interchange edit

 

The article Jitra North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  03:19, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jitra South Interchange edit

 

The article Jitra South Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  03:20, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kepala Batas Interchange edit

 

The article Kepala Batas Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  03:20, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gurun Interchange edit

 

The article Gurun Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  03:52, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sungai Petani North Interchange edit

 

The article Sungai Petani North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  03:52, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sungai Petani South Interchange edit

 

The article Sungai Petani South Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  14:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bertam Interchange edit

 

The article Bertam Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  14:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sungai Dua Interchange edit

 

The article Sungai Dua Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  14:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Permatang Pauh Interchange (NSE) edit

 

The article Permatang Pauh Interchange (NSE) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  14:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Seberang Jaya Interchange edit

 

The article Seberang Jaya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  14:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Perai Interchange edit

 

The article Perai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  14:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Penang Bridge Interchange edit

 

The article Penang Bridge Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  14:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Juru Interchange edit

 

The article Juru Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bukit Tambun Interchange edit

 

The article Bukit Tambun Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jawi Interchange edit

 

The article Jawi Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bandar Baharu Interchange edit

 

The article Bandar Baharu Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Alor Pongsu Interchange edit

 

The article Alor Pongsu Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bukit Merah Interchange, Malaysia edit

 

The article Bukit Merah Interchange, Malaysia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Taiping North Interchange edit

 

The article Taiping North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Changkat Jering Interchange edit

 

The article Changkat Jering Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:50, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kuala Kangsar Interchange edit

 

The article Kuala Kangsar Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:50, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Meru Raya Interchange edit

 

The article Meru Raya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:51, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ipoh North Interchange edit

 

The article Ipoh North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:51, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ipoh South Interchange edit

 

The article Ipoh South Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tambun Interchange edit

 

The article Tambun Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Simpang Pulai Interchange edit

 

The article Simpang Pulai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gopeng Interchange edit

 

The article Gopeng Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:54, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tapah Interchange edit

 

The article Tapah Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bidor Interchange edit

 

The article Bidor Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:56, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sungkai Interchange edit

 

The article Sungkai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:56, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Slim River Interchange edit

 

The article Slim River Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Behrang Interchange edit

 

The article Behrang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tanjung Malim Interchange edit

 

The article Tanjung Malim Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lembah Beringin Interchange edit

 

The article Lembah Beringin Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bukit Beruntung Interchange edit

 

The article Bukit Beruntung Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sungai Buaya Interchange edit

 

The article Sungai Buaya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rawang Interchange edit

 

The article Rawang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  16:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rawang South Interchange edit

 

The article Rawang South Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hospital Sungai Buloh Interchange edit

 

The article Hospital Sungai Buloh Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sungai Buloh Interchange edit

 

The article Sungai Buloh Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bukit Lanjan Interchange edit

 

The article Bukit Lanjan Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Permatang Pauh Interchange (BKE) edit

 

The article Permatang Pauh Interchange (BKE) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bukit Raja Interchange edit

 

The article Bukit Raja Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Shah Alam Interchange edit

 

The article Shah Alam Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Subang Interchange edit

 

The article Subang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Damansara Interchange edit

 

The article Damansara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ebor Interchange edit

 

The article Ebor Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Seafield Interchange edit

 

The article Seafield Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of USJ Interchange edit

 

The article USJ Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Putra Heights Interchange edit

 

The article Putra Heights Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nilai North Interchange edit

 

The article Nilai North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:08, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of UPM Interchange edit

 

The article UPM Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:08, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kajang Interchange edit

 

The article Kajang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bangi Interchange edit

 

The article Bangi Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Putra Mahkota Interchange edit

 

The article Putra Mahkota Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nilai Interchange edit

 

The article Nilai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:12, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Seremban Interchange edit

 

The article Seremban Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Port Dickson Interchange edit

 

The article Port Dickson Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pedas/Linggi Interchange edit

 

The article Pedas/Linggi Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Simpang Ampat Interchange edit

 

The article Simpang Ampat Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tangkak Interchange edit

 

The article Tangkak Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bukit Gambir Interchange edit

 

The article Bukit Gambir Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pagoh Interchange edit

 

The article Pagoh Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Yong Peng North Interchange edit

 

The article Yong Peng North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Yong Peng South Interchange edit

 

The article Yong Peng South Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ayer Hitam Interchange edit

 

The article Ayer Hitam Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Machap Interchange edit

 

The article Machap Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Simpang Renggam Interchange edit

 

The article Simpang Renggam Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sedenak Interchange edit

 

The article Sedenak Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Senai North Interchange edit

 

The article Senai North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Skudai Interchange edit

 

The article Skudai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kempas Interchange edit

 

The article Kempas Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dato' Onn Interchange edit

 

The article Dato' Onn Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pasir Gudang Interchange edit

 

The article Pasir Gudang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lukut Interchange edit

 

The article Lukut Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Senai Airport Interchange edit

 

The article Senai Airport Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Saleng Interchange edit

 

The article Saleng Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pulai Interchange edit

 

The article Pulai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nusajaya Interchange edit

 

The article Nusajaya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nusa Indah Interchange edit

 

The article Nusa Indah Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bukit Indah Interchange edit

 

The article Bukit Indah Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 Template:North-South Expressway interchanges has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979  17:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

The remainder of the navboxes in Category:Malaysia expressway and road templates were added to the nomination as well. Please feel free to comment at the discussion. Imzadi 1979  18:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bandar Saujana Putra Interchange edit

 

The article Bandar Saujana Putra Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  17:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paya Jaras Interchange edit

 

The article Paya Jaras Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bukit Subang Interchange edit

 

The article Bukit Subang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bukit Jelutong North Interchange edit

 

The article Bukit Jelutong North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jelatek Interchange edit

 

The article Jelatek Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ampang-MRR2 Interchange edit

 

The article Ampang-MRR2 Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hulu Langat Interchange edit

 

The article Hulu Langat Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bandar Tun Hussein Onn Interchange edit

 

The article Bandar Tun Hussein Onn Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sri Damansara Interchange edit

 

The article Sri Damansara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Penchala Interchange edit

 

The article Penchala Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bandar Utama Interchange edit

 

The article Bandar Utama Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of TTDI Interchange edit

 

The article TTDI Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Damansara Utama Interchange edit

 

The article Damansara Utama Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of SS 2 Interchange edit

 

The article SS 2 Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Taman Megah Interchange edit

 

The article Taman Megah Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kelana Jaya Interchange edit

 

The article Kelana Jaya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jalan Majlis Interchange edit

 

The article Jalan Majlis Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Freescale Interchange edit

 

The article Freescale Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of PJS Interchange edit

 

The article PJS Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Puchong Jaya Interchange edit

 

The article Puchong Jaya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jalan Kuching Interchange edit

 

The article Jalan Kuching Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:59, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sentul Pasar Interchange edit

 

The article Sentul Pasar Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  06:59, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Setiawangsa Interchange edit

 

The article Setiawangsa Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Taman Hillview Interchange edit

 

The article Taman Hillview Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:01, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Greenwood Interchange edit

 

The article Greenwood Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bukit Tinggi Interchange edit

 

The article Bukit Tinggi Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bentong East Interchange edit

 

The article Bentong East Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Karak Interchange edit

 

The article Karak Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lanchang Interchange edit

 

The article Lanchang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Temerloh Interchange edit

 

The article Temerloh Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chenor Interchange edit

 

The article Chenor Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Maran Interchange edit

 

The article Maran Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sri Jaya Interchange edit

 

The article Sri Jaya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kuantan Interchange edit

 

The article Kuantan Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Semenyih Interchange edit

 

The article Semenyih Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pajam Interchange edit

 

The article Pajam Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mantin Interchange edit

 

The article Mantin Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Setul Interchange edit

 

The article Setul Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ampangan Interchange edit

 

The article Ampangan Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bulatan Darul Ehsan Interchange edit

 

The article Bulatan Darul Ehsan Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:14, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bulatan Jubli Perak Interchange edit

 

The article Bulatan Jubli Perak Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Alam Impian Interchange edit

 

The article Alam Impian Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kemuning Interchange edit

 

The article Kemuning Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jengka Interchange edit

 

The article Jengka Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kewajipan Interchange (NPE) edit

 

The article Kewajipan Interchange (NPE) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pantai Interchange edit

 

The article Pantai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pantai Dalam Interchange edit

 

The article Pantai Dalam Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pantai Baharu Interchange edit

 

The article Pantai Baharu Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ulu Tiram Interchange edit

 

The article Ulu Tiram Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cahaya Baru Interchange edit

 

The article Cahaya Baru Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bukit Rimau Interchange edit

 

The article Bukit Rimau Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hicom Interchange edit

 

The article Hicom Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kewajipan Interchange (SAE) edit

 

The article Kewajipan Interchange (SAE) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kinrara Interchange edit

 

The article Kinrara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Awan Besar Interchange edit

 

The article Awan Besar Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sukom Interchange edit

 

The article Sukom Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sri Petaling Interchange edit

 

The article Sri Petaling Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of SKVE Interchange edit

 

The article SKVE Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:28, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mont Kiara Interchange edit

 

The article Mont Kiara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sri Hartamas Interchange edit

 

The article Sri Hartamas Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pusat Sains Negara Interchange edit

 

The article Pusat Sains Negara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of INTAN Interchange edit

 

The article INTAN Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bukit Kiara Interchange edit

 

The article Bukit Kiara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kerinchi Interchange edit

 

The article Kerinchi Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kayu Ara Interchange edit

 

The article Kayu Ara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:34, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Section 17 Interchange edit

 

The article Section 17 Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of TTDI North Interchange edit

 

The article TTDI North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  07:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply


Proposed deletion of 2006 Nibong Tebal bus crash edit

 

The article 2006 Nibong Tebal bus crash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS and no indication of continuing notability or maintenance, wholly unsourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Salak Interchange edit

 

The article Salak Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979  15:55, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply