January 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Nathaniel Clyne without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 00:11, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Emmanuel Mayuka with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 00:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Adel Taarabt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GiantSnowman 10:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeated blanking and removal of content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

GiantSnowman 16:06, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Agirretxe, you are invited to the Teahouse edit

 

Hi Agirretxe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry edit

I have blocked your new account Agirretxe10 (talk · contribs) - if you create another account to edit disruptively I will block you indefinitely. GiantSnowman 18:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

You continue to use this account to edit disruptively - so I have blocked you indefinitely. GiantSnowman 19:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinitely for repeated vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

GiantSnowman 19:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Reply