After all this time, no one has posted a note to me.

Sam Harris edit

Before you reinstate content that was removed, you should discuss the edit and try to find consensus on the article's talk page. Guettarda (talk) 23:58, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Again you have reinstated undue material on Sam Harris without seeking consensus on the article's talk page. Also, please read Wikipedia's Manuel of Style, so you can become aware of how to use em and en dashes appropriately and avoid making further erroneous "corrections". --Epipelagic (talk) 05:08, 31 October 2017 (UTC)sReply

Welcome! edit

 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Here is your long-overdue Welcome to Wikipedia, AgeOfPlantagenet! Thank you for your contributions. I am Lionelt and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! – Lionel(talk) 06:20, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Christianity Barnstar
is hereby awarded to AgeOfPlantagenet for outstanding contributions to Christianity-related articles. – Lionel(talk) 06:22, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fixes at List of people with epilepsy edit

Hi there, when you get a minute, might you take a look at your recent edit of List of people with epilepsy? When you removed some recent vandalism, you also removed other stuff as well, resulting in errors. No big deal, I've repaired the page - I only mention it because for whatever reason, I am having a devil of a time getting my fixes there to "stick". I just want to do what I can to make sure that one dumb citation actually stays fixed this time. Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 01:06, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2019 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Resurrection of Jesus, did not appear constructive. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. This

Since you didn't reply to my talk page note when you edited the article, I'm going to go ahead and move these items in with the rest of the similar ones.

is WP:DISRUPTIVE. See WP:DEADLINE and WP:CONSENSUS. You've moved that info downward, replaced it with quotes from primary sources, moved it downward again, and now moved it into a note, without awaiting further discussion or reaching consensus. See also WP:3RR. It's clear you don't like it, and are doing your utmost best to get it out of sight. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:27, 21 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I addressed these accusations on the Talk:Ressurection of Jesus. Stop tossing around baseless accusations and actually look at the context. I didn't do anything wrong, and certainly shouldn't be treated like a vandal. AgeOfPlantagenet (talk) 15:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Ryn78 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ryn78. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 01:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply