Afterrock81

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Abiogenesis, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Abiogenesis was changed by Afterrock81 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.845841 on 2010-11-23T05:04:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:04, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

• Re: this comment, please see Scientific theory & WP:WTA. Please also read WP:V & WP:FRINGE. Unsourced additions pushing pseudoscientific fringe claims will be reverted as a matter of course. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 05:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Abiogenesis. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 05:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

• You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Abiogenesis. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. . Further, the source you cite, [1], has nothing to say about either Abiogenesis, or intelligent design. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 06:13, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:59, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Discussion of Abiogenesis‎

The proper forum for discussion of this article is Talk:Abiogenesis‎, not my talkpage -- I have moved your comment there, and replied to it. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 18:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)