February 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nativity of Jesus—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 01:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Afellowservant! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 01:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 22:19, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Secondary sources edit

Since you've left me a message on my talk page, I'll do the same for you. Listen to the people telling you that an article needs to be supported by secondary sources and cannot consist solely of interpretations of primary sources, since everyone can have those and they might not always be the truth, accepted or otherwise. Happy to help! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:Afellowservant/sandbox edit

  Hello, Afellowservant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Afellowservant/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of User:Afellowservant/sandbox edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Afellowservant/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply