Advocatus diaboli

Drafts and notes

• Annals of Russian Hypocrisy: The Tallinn Riots
• 'Liberators of Tallin' (pictures speak for themselves
• Calls in Poland for relocation of their communist era monuments (article is in Estonian

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Advocatus diaboli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

90.190.56.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Attempting to intimidate or harass other users: willful and wanton abuse at User talk:Kuban kazak

• Blocking administrator: Coelacan (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: It is highly likely you are responsible for this abusive edit by 90.190.56.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). You are personally blocked now for 48 hours. Read WP:NPA. — Sandstein 23:05, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Advocatus diaboli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was apparently BLOCKED for 48 hours, because yesterday I found out that my account was autoblocked (due to edits by someone who is also using IP 90.190.56.10) and immediately asked for unblocking MY account. I emphasise that this IP is currently used by many people and it is no surprise that the different Estonian users currently have a similar object of interest (namely Bronze Soldier of Tallinn). I call for immediate unblocking of my Wikipedia account: an un(auto)block request filed by me on my talk page is no justification for blocking me for 48 hours! Which guideline allowed it??? NB! there was also no real reason for 31 hour block of the IP address concerned, bacause only non-constructive edit by this IP was a mere response to User:Kuban kazak equalling Estonians with 'Fascist pigs'. Although the case was reported, no measures were taken against that established user. If User:Sandstein who blocked MY account refers to WP:NPA, I can't understand, why heavy insults against whole nations are encouraged here in Wikipedia Advocatus diaboli 07:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Already declined. Luigi30 (Taλk) 13:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.