User talk:A p3rson/Archives/2010/April

Please note that I only edited my own comment...

OK I did that in a bad and slopy way but all I was trying to do was to add my own signature to my post,I used the preview function to see that was all I did and there was no responses. Please consider using an other word to describe this than "vandalism".In the future if I do edit my comments I will do so the right way.Thank you--81.232.105.190 (talk) 22:12, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


Dagger

[1] if you wish to remove a {{fact}} you should provide a WP:RS first not just remove the template. Thanks Gnevin (talk) 21:59, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Todd Blackburn

Just wanted to say thanks for removing all the redlinks to Todd Blackburn after his AFD. I'd been meaning to do it myslef but have just been so short of time lately that I didn't get round to it. Cheers, Ranger Steve (talk) 11:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Israeli Peace camp

my edit was perfectly reasonable and I gave reason for each edit in the comments. did you ignore my comments or you just thought it is not good enough for you? that article is left-bashing written by some ultra-rightist redneck.. or are you trying to start a revert war???? 216.19.179.72 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC).

First of all, none of these edits are reasonable. Second, your "reasons" are not reasons, they have no value whatsoever. Third, all of these comments are cited and referenced. Fourth, they all follow the NPOV policy. Finally, if you think that this needs to be removed, then please ask on the talk page, and obtain community consensus before removing large amounts of information. Now that you have been warned, it will count as vandalism if you remove it without consensus.  A p3rson  23:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Why?

Please read.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Immunize#Not_Vandalism.21

I'm sick of administrators acting like bots. If you're too lazy to read my reasons, then just let a bot do the work.

69.122.120.192 (talk) 20:11, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

List of Serbs

Ivo ANdric is not a Serb —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.172.213.56 (talk) 23:12, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

And would you happen to have any references?  A p3rson  23:13, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
First you gotta reply me on my discussion page, Second Ivo Andric is not a Serb, read a little and then come to speak with me. If one areticle says that Germany is part of Africa, should I put references? that's like that.--190.172.213.56 (talk) 23:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
I am not asking for the fact if you have gathered information, I am asking for your sources. Removing text from articles is not highly smiled upon, unless we have consensus.  A p3rson  23:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

This information is wrong, I can't put references now, but just look at pages like: List of Bosnians and List of Croats, he's there also. As I said before that's a terrible mistake that dont require that someone put references, and stop to reply me on your discussion page. --190.172.213.56 (talk) 23:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

One of the cornerstones of Wikipedia is references. Something like this does REQUIRE references. Otherwise, all other attempts are vandalism. The only other way around this is to achieve consensus on the talk page.

P.S. - When you edit a page, look below the edit window. Click on the verifiable link.  A p3rson  23:33, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Arab Bank Scandal BLP

I don't know anything about how wikipedia works, but the quote from the BLP page seems pretty clear: "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." The Arab Bank scandal on Fayyad's page seems like an obvious case of this. It looks like you have had trouble adhering to Wikipedia policies in the past. I advise you to be more careful in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.10.34 (talk) 00:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

After looking at the Arab Bank page, I found the section on the scandal. It appears to be just a bad copypasta of that section, on to the Salam Fayyad page. This is sourced, with agreeable sources, all that needs to be done is to add them back in. Other than that, this is a valid BLP.
P.S - In the future, please do this kind of research yourself to see if there is more information, BEFORE removing it. We here at Wikipedia like to add to articles, before removing things.  A p3rson  01:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Empower_Up_Logo.jpg)

  Thanks for uploading File:Empower_Up_Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 04:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Actually, this file is in use, just not in article space ATM. I have the page in my userspace, and will be released soon.  A p3rson  23:39, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

  Hey there A p3rson, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:A p3rson/Empower Up. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:00, 18 April 2010 (UTC)