User talk:APPU/Archives/2021/November

Replaceable fair use File:Dr Rajkumar.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Dr Rajkumar.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 03:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dr Rajkumar.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Dr Rajkumar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of 12, Tughlaq Road for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 12, Tughlaq Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12, Tughlaq Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 08:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk Road for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mustafa Kemal Ataturk Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustafa Kemal Ataturk Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

(t · c) buidhe 22:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Krishna Allavaru for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krishna Allavaru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna Allavaru until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

kashmīrī TALK 12:20, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of New India Foundation

Hello APPU,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged New India Foundation for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hatchens (talk) 14:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gandhi Before India latest cover.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Gandhi Before India latest cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have added the image to Gandhi Before India Appu (talk) 19:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Swaraj is my birth right and I shall have it!

  Swaraj is my birth right and I shall have it!, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Swaraj is my birth right and I shall have it! and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Swaraj is my birth right and I shall have it! during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — kashmīrī TALK 12:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Swaraj is my birth right and I shall have it! for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swaraj is my birth right and I shall have it! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swaraj is my birth right and I shall have it! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

kashmīrī TALK 14:04, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Nehru and Bose for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nehru and Bose is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nehru and Bose until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

kashmīrī TALK 14:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of The Case That Shook India for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Case That Shook India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Case That Shook India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

kashmīrī TALK 14:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chachaji

 

A tag has been placed on Chachaji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — kashmīrī TALK 18:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your contributions to-date

Hi Appu, I very much appreciate your keen interest in editing Wikipedia, and I'm glad that you have made quite a few valuable contributions. At the same time, however, a large proportion of your edits is problematic and makes other editors waste a lot of time on correcting them. For instance, a significant number of articles you created had to be nominated for deletion, because they did not comply with Wikipedia notability criteria. This is, frankly, a waste of yours and the community's time.

Additionally, the way you used references in your articles is incorrect if not deliberately misleading. For instance, you listed six references[1] in Nehru and Bose, however only two of them had anything to do with the article subject while the rest were there, I think, to make the article appear as sourced (even though it was not).

Wikipedia is not a dictionary; even less a Hindi dictionary.[2]

All in all, I strongly suggest you to pause article creation efforts, review the way you flood Wikipedia with largely unimportant stuff, and devote some of your time to reading the policies. A list of the key ones is in the first message on this page. — kashmīrī TALK 19:36, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

There are other articles that you created on notable / important topics but need higher quality sources, such as democratic backsliding in India which is covered extensively in scholarly sources. (t · c) buidhe 20:10, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for taking time in bringing this to my attention. The sources are could be misplaced perhaps for I googled results containing those specific phrases rather than to check their content convincingly. This is a grave mistake as I think of it now. I am to make sure this may not happen again. Appu (talk) 09:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
OK, thank you. Just to be clear - ideally, Wikipedia should contain only information found in reliable sources (see the principle of verifiability). All the facts and statements added by editors (except some obvious ones) should be explicitly supported by references. References are not there to replace Google Search for the reader – for this, we use a Further reading section. Best wishes, — kashmīrī TALK 10:11, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

How should communication work in the Wikipedia Android app?