AMuseo

DYK for Pomander Walk

On March 15, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pomander Walk, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Salford Manor House

On March 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Salford Manor House, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Jihad satire

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Metropolitan Museum of Art Roof Garden

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:04, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for meeting the wonderful place I visited last in 1996 - before the exhibitions mentioned. But the Calatrava in Valencia we met recently, and his Auditorio de Tenerife. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Big Bambú

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for One Madison Park

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for IDF Tick Tock

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for The Level Club

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Garima Gospels

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:01, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 14:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Palestine Gold Star

Awarded to AMuseo for his outstanding work on Palestinian attractions

DYK for Sag Harbor Whaling Museum

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:05, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Old Whaler's Church (Sag Harbor)

The DYK project (nominate) 12:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Gaza Mall

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for James McMaster

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Crazy Water Park

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:04, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Eliot School rebellion

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Roots Club

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for As-Sadaka Gaza Olympic Swimming Pool

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Templo de Salomão

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Al-Bustan resort (Gaza)

Courcelles 18:02, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Abel Pann

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Sukkah City

The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Poughkeepsie plan

Courcelles 06:03, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Cinema City Nablus

Courcelles 12:03, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Boys High School

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:05, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Girls High School

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Al Deira Hotel

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Palazzo Chupi

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:04, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Hezbollah theme park

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for The Conquered Banner

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for St. Martin's Church, Biberach

The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Clandestine church

The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for St. Ninian's Church, Tynet

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of David
		Great and well-needed expansion to Southern wall. Linda Olive (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Watervliet Shaker Historic District

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for MV Avrasaya

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Southern Wall

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Franklin D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms Park

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for 2010 Stewart–Colbert rallies

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks due at Southern Wall

		The Original Barnstar
		I was delighted to see the Southern Wall article. After I discovered how you had expanded it so comprehensively, I hereby award you this barnstar for you sterling efforts. Many thanks and keep up the good work! Chesdovi (talk) 21:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of 2010 European terror plot for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article 2010 European terror plot, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 European terror plot until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TM 19:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Palestinian drive-by shooting for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Palestinian drive-by shooting, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palestinian drive-by shooting until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TM 20:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

User:John Vandenberg/Deletion sorting tool

hey amuseo, check out the above tool. it would make deletion sorting much easier. let me know if it's too technical for you and I will try to help (but i wont be around much the next 3 days). best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 21:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Islamization of the Gaza Strip

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:05, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

The Teacher's Bookshop

Just a note to let you know that I've given your article The Teacher's Bookshop a rewrite for NPOV to ensure it is suitable for main page exposure via DYK. Most of the information you had included I managed to retain, albeit with changes to the text, but in addition I have added considerably more detail in most areas. I will probably be adding a little more in coming days, and also restoring any missing refs and adding some more cites. I think the rewrite is considerably more informative and I hope it meets with your approval. If not, please let me know at the article talk page and we'll see if we can resolve the issues. Gatoclass (talk) 18:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I hope that you will take a look at the wikibias website.~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by RockvilleMD (talk • contribs) 15:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for The Teacher's Bookshop

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Gaza Baptist Church

The DYK project (nominate) 18:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Historicist for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. nableezy - 19:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

I am sorry to see this. A clean start was a fine idea but it isn't allowed if a ban is in place. Please keep the standard offer and the appeal process over at AE in mind if you do wish to return. I think you have proven that you can work well in the topic area and think you could make a case for being allowed to return sooner than later. Unfortunately, the principle of disregarding your ban will probably be too much of a red flag.Cptnono (talk) 22:51, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

ANI

I have raised a discussion at ANI concerning your use of multiple accounts. You may wish to contribute to the discussion. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts and evading a topic ban. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Your contributed article, Abu Ubaida (Hamas military leader)

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Abu Ubaida (Hamas military leader). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Abu Obeida. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Abu Obeida - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William A. Jacobson

The article William A. Jacobson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No third party sources to provide evidence of meeting Wikipedia:Notability (academics).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Feezo (Talk) 02:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Islamization of Jerusalem under Jordanian occupation

The article Islamization of Jerusalem under Jordanian occupation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extremely poor article using unreliable sources; WP:SYNTH, etc, etc. A transparant POV-push by a sock of a banned user. If good sources could be found which explicitely talks about islamization then the article could be re-created. Improving on this article as it stands is not possible, however, as it's pure junk.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Frederico1234 (talk) 13:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Herzliya Shawarma restaurant bombing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Herzliya Shawarma restaurant bombing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herzliya Shawarma restaurant bombing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind _talk 03:50, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Frederick M. Lawrence

The article Frederick M. Lawrence has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 22:00, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of 142 West 109th St. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 142 West 109th St. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/142 West 109th St. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:09, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Frank Sharry

The article Frank Sharry has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jmundo (talk) 21:36, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lee Smith (journalist)

The article Lee Smith (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I do not see adequate sourcing for notability , nor is the position held as one of the senior editors of a newspaper, likely to be notable . Nor is authorship of a single book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 08:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Strong Horse

The article The Strong Horse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence for notability of this book

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 08:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Paul E. Marek for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul E. Marek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul E. Marek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Animalparty! (talk) 03:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jihad satire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jihad satire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jihad satire (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iskandar323 (talk) 09:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jihad satire

A tag has been placed on Jihad satire, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:32, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Snobar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snobar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snobar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Osps7 (talk) 21:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Category:English given names invented by fiction writers has been nominated for renaming

Category:English given names invented by fiction writers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 08:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)