User talk:98Tigerius/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Happy New Year!

98Tigerius,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! — 🎉🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎉 (🔔 • 📝) 08:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Wishing You a Prosperous and Happy New Year!

98Tigerius,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! — 🎉🎆 marchrain13 🎆🎉 (🔔 • 📝) 13:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Shop For Killers (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A Shop For Killers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 98Tigerius! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2024!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello 98Tigerius: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Shop For Killers poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Shop For Killers poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

13th Circle Chart Music Award

Digital Album of the Year is not a main award. Its criteria are based on sales of non-CD album format (SMC, Nemo, Poca, QR, NFC, etc.) It is somewhat equivalent to KiT Album of the Year. Duskmoon2005 (talk) 14:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

@Duskmoon2005 Alright thanks for the clarification of the said award. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 14:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

I think we can just use a bit of common sense here. Based on http://www.circlemusicawards.co.kr/eng/musicAward_award.php many other awards such as Retail Album of the Year, V Coloring of the Year, Social Hot Star of the Year, etc. are also not included as special awards but previous years pages treat them as such because they are not the Main awards.

Also, there is no logic behind Digital Album of the Year as the highest award (Daesang). The scope is even smaller compared to Artist of the Year - Album which criteria includes all album format.

Another point is according to http://www.circlemusicawards.co.kr/eng/history.php throughout their history Gaon Chart Music Award/Circle Chart Music Award only recognize Artist of the Year (Digital), Artist of the Year (Physical Album) & Rookie of the Year Duskmoon2005 (talk) 14:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Page moves

Hello, 98Tigerius,

Why did you move Death's Game to a different page title and then move it right back? Article page moves should be thought through and not casually done. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi admin Liz, I apologize for what I did on Death's Game article. I already requested a speedy deletion for the redirect page. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 10:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of The Heart of Asia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Heart of Asia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Heart of Asia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gino March (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

List of South Korean Boy Bands Edit

Hi, I would like to discuss about my edits in the page.

The reason I put the groups in alphabetical order is because the girl group list page also does the same thing. And also, I think it will only make sense that if the other group was listed by alphabetical order then the groups in the main list should be arranged that way too.

Previously the girl group list was arranged in chronological order of their debuting too, but was changed by other user in alphabetical order, so I'm not sure why the same couldn't be apply to both pages.

Hooplasledge23 (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

@Hooplasledge23: The list should arrange in chronological order by their debut year as it's been like that since the creation. The girl group list should be reverted back. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 17:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Alright. Thank you. :) Hooplasledge23 (talk) 17:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

@Hooplasledge23: I changed my mind, let's arrange the K-boy groups list in alphabetical order. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 17:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Designated Survivor: 60 Days, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Joon-hyuk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Jan 2024

Well Episode 823 doesn't have a source either so why didn't you remove that one? I can't really site a live show... but I will try and find one Taorenxuan (talk) 11:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

@Taorenxuan I already updated the list article. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 11:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

same Taorenxuan (talk) 12:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

@98Tigerius same Taorenxuan (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

@98Tigerius I just cited it then you remove it? You literally told me to add a citation Taorenxuan (talk) 12:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

@Taorenxuan it is an unreliable source per WP:KO/RS#UR. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 12:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

2005 UAAP Women's Volleyball

Hello, 98Tigerius,

Recently you moved this article and in the edit summary, you called it "page move vandalism". The editor who had moved the article to a different title had made many edits to this article already and, I assume, thought a different (but very similar) title was more suitable. Please do not call page moves or edits "vandalism" unless there is damage done to the article and its contents. Assume good faith of other editors, especially those who had been working on those articles that are being moved. I imagine that if I reverted a move you had done and called it "vandalism" you would not be pleased. So, don't just randomly pick one of the selected edit summaries because it's convenient and maybe write your own in that is more appropriate. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Noted that admin. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 02:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello 98Tigerius!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Recent images-related changes

Please don't knee jerk WP:POINT just because you're reverted on one article by someone whom just anyhow quote without technical knowledge, everyone will now and then experienced such things which is perfectly normal, but how you response is what is important instead. In addition, .png is preferred format for WP:NFCC images regardless of what WP:PIFU mentions which is an outdated article btw, just looks at its talk page. When dealing with NFCC images, we are obviously required to downsize the original image which when saved to .jpg/.jpeg compromise the quality as it uses lossy compression whereas .png uses lossless compression meaning the quality stays the same and not resulting in low quality blurry or distorted NFCC images. If you want read more about, this article by Adobe explains it perfectly. Thanks! — 🧧🍊 Paper9oll 🍊🧧 (🔔 • 📝) 14:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Paper9oll, thanks for that great information. — 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 20:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Shop for Killers poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Shop for Killers poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Missing Crown Prince poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Missing Crown Prince poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:My Name is Loh Kiwan poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:My Name is Loh Kiwan poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wonderful World (South Korean TV series) poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wonderful World (South Korean TV series) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Matter of principle - DUNE PART 2

I know very well that is how the book ends. But, how would, say, any old wiki editor prove that they've been to a premiere or advanced screening? Yeah, all lines up with the book, but as a matter of principle, how are DUNEFAN or whatnot, him obviously not being neutral, going to prove what he says is true? Not like the plot of "the film" is public knowledge. ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit Revision

Hello, may I ask why my edit updating the web show episode number under Zhang Hao (singer) keeps getting reverted? Thank you for helping with the reference formatting. Cleokafka (talk) 05:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

@Cleokafka, because the edits you made was in one revision so that's why all of it was reverted. Anyways, I updated the episode. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 05:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

I see, I'll avoid multiple changes in one edit in the future. Thank you! Cleokafka (talk) 23:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Message

Every sports league and club article has sport link in first sentence; why dont you try same with football or any other, see how fast will be reverted. I will notify more users to check your actions. Loptač01 (talk) 22:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Death's Game album cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Death's Game album cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Death's Game

Hello @98Tigerius! For the page Death's Game, can I ask why Yi Jae's reincarnation belongs under the main cast? Wheezythewave (talk) 01:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

@Wheezythewave: I modified it. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 05:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yura Yura (Unmei no Hana) has been accepted

Yura Yura (Unmei no Hana), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 09:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Heads up: Incorrect internal link

Hey mate~ I saw you added the comedian Nam Chang-hee to Queen of Tears last month with an internal link to their page, however the page that exists is for a scientist and not a comedian. Just wanted to mention a heads up as this is common since Korean names are so similiar. Have a good one! ₪RicknAsia₪ 07:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

@Rickinasia thanks for notifying me about it. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 07:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

JUNGKOOK GOLDEN ALBUM HUNGARIAN CHART

Hi, I suggested an edit for Jungkook's page, GOLDEN reached #1 on Hungarian physical album chart twice, I also included the source. But I still cannot see it on the page. Is there any problem with it? Thanks in advance. JKHungary (talk) 18:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@JKHungary: The one you provided is different from the one that was included in Jungkook's Golden album article, see it for yourself. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 19:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes, because there are two album charts in Hungary. One is the combined chart, Jungkook's Golden album article contains that. But there is another official chart which is the Physical Album chart and he reached #1 twice on that chart. Just as I included the source. It is listed on the Hungarian Wikipedia page too for #1s on album chart.

https://slagerlistak.hu/album-top-40-slagerlista-fizikai-hanghordozok/2023/49

https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Mahasz_Top_40_albumlist%C3%A1j%C3%A1nak_els%C5%91_helyezettjei_2020%E2%80%932029_k%C3%B6z%C3%B6tt

Pls check these. Thank you. JKHungary (talk) 21:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@JKHungary: From what I understand the one to include in chart table is the one already in Golden album per MAHASZ#Charts and the one you want to include is not even in the criteria. Also see 5-Star (Stray Kids album), even though it charted no.1 for 7 times on Album Top 40 chart (physical media) it was not included on the chart table. If you still insist it, you can ask other editors on the Golden album talk page as their more experience about the charting system. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 02:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Music Bank 2023

Hey 98Tigerius, I don't know if you remember or but we had talked about nominating List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023) for FL status back in December. I believe that the list is now ready and can be nominated. If you would like to nominate it then go ahead else I am more than happy to help you out with that. Happy editing! -- EN-Jungwon 10:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I still remember. I'll start nominating it now. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 18:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Hey, I noticed that you haven't transcluded the nomination on the main FLC page. Is there an issue with that? -- EN-Jungwon 08:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Oh I just followed what was instructed when I nominated it and I thought it will be automatically added there. I don't know why it is not transcluded. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 09:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I added it now. I forgot to read the last procedure of nomination. Thanks for reminding it. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 10:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

WP:REPEATLINK

WP:REPEATLINK does not encourage linking in separate tables in separate sections, and you'll find that when a link is already present in the body of an article, it is usually not linked again, even if REPEATLINK says "once per major section" is fine—you can see GAs and FAs for this standard. Besides, you clearly noticed I had removed the links, which were only added late last month. They were not present up until that point, therefore WP:STATUSQUO and WP:BRD apply as I was reverting to the way the page was. Please do not manually revert an edit restoring the way the page was (BRD). I don't believe readers are aided by the same links that are present in the table directly above. I really don't believe readers would jump to the monthly chart table alone and skip the weekly one, therefore I believe most readers have already encountered those links by the time they reach the monthly chart table. Ss112 08:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Then why List of UK Albums Chart number ones of the 2000s, a featured list, repeatedly hyperlink/wikilink the same artist(s) and/or album(s) in a different subsections? Also the List of Gaon Album Chart number ones of 2010 to List of Gaon Album Chart number ones of 2016 have all repeated links in monthly chart table but no one bother to de-link those. So MOS:STYLEVAR applies before that non-existent STATUSQUO of yours and it should be the same from 2017 to 2024 lists. It is also said in MOS:REPEATLINK: Duplicate linking in stand-alone and embedded lists is permissible if it significantly aids the reader. This is most often the case when the list is presenting information that could just as aptly be formatted in a table, and is expected to be parsed for particular bits of data, not read from top to bottom. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 10:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

98Tigerius, I have nothing to do with those lists as I did not create them and have either never or barely ever edited them. The lists you just cited are also longer and more complete than this. While it's a deletion-discussion argument, the logic of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS applies here: just because there are other instances of repeat-linking on Wikipedia doesn't mean it needs to be done everywhere, or that because I have a standard I'm following that I'm going to seek out contrary instances and apply my preference everywhere. While the part you just quoted is talking about repeat linking within the same table, the idea of linking in adjacent tables is why I just said I don't believe readers are aided by the same links that are present in the table directly above. I really don't believe readers would jump to the monthly chart table alone and skip the weekly one, therefore I believe most readers have already encountered those links by the time they reach the monthly chart table. Ss112 10:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes, you have nothing to do with those list nor I but there should be "consistency" in those related list articles. And why would you follow your own standard and preference? Please read WP:OWN. Anyways, we will never have a agreement as we see things differently so I will seek a third opinion to settle this once and for all. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 11:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

@98Tigerius Seeking a third opinion to settle something once and for all is not the way Wikipedia works, but FWIW I agree with @Ss112 who has far more experience here than you and has cited well-established Wikipedia policies which you are ignoring. I suggest you move on. Shantavira|^{feed me} 11:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

There doesn't have to be "consistency" in list articles or on Wikipedia in general because articles are written and worked on by different editors. I don't think that I "own" an article merely because I reverted to the way it was, hence STATUSQUO—the way it was for months before an editor added the repeated links last month. You also misinterpreted what MOS:STYLEVAR applies to. It doesn't apply to nor does it even say it applies to sets of articles (e.g. number-one lists for a certain chart)—it applies to individual articles and unnecessarily changing the style of it from one to another. Ss112 12:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

UAAP 86 Awardees

Hi, Von here. Just wanted to mention that I believe the awardees should have their full names as these are official awards, and it has been the precedent in the past pages of the tournament. Otherwise, consistency should be applied, and have the past pages updated to reflect this. Thanks Voncabriga (talk) 06:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Just to add, not having the full name or at least using the nickname mashes the awards seem informal. Some of the nicknames also weren’t mentioned or referenced in the page, and may cause some confusion as to who the awardees are to someone who doesn’t follow the tournament. Just my two cents. Voncabriga (talk) 08:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Just wanted to put that up for discussion and see from your point of view for the edits. I don’t mean to impose my side, will obviously lean more on what the standards are Voncabriga (talk) 08:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

I understand it but I still stand by my reasons on why I undid some of your edits earlier. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Yup that’s fair. Just wanted to understand the other side of it as well. I just lean more on consistency, and formality. Happy to be corrected, of course, if there’s some standards to it. Cheers! Voncabriga (talk) 09:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Hierarchy (TV series) edit unconstructive?

Why did you revert this edit I made to the page of the TV series Hierarchy as "non-constructive"? I was doing simple copyediting because the previous sentence wasn't written correctly (it was missing a verb to tie everything up) and adding a citation because the text in the lede didn't seem to be restated with a citation in the body. I see no reason as to why my edit would be unconstructive—I wasn't vandalizing or adding unsourced info or anything. Wuju Daisuki (talk) 21:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Because there's nothing wrong with sentence but I already modified it and apologize if I offended you with the revert. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Women's Volleyball ranking for Olympics 2024

Greetings, I did the modifications to the score because since the first week of the VNL is over, the ranking has changed. That is why I modified it using this website: https://en.volleyballworld.com/volleyball/world-ranking/women. 166.62.170.41 (talk) 23:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

There's no need to changed it as that's the rank of the 24 teams that competed from last year's Olympic qualification tournaments. If you want to modified then do it in FIVB Senior World Rankings. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Re: Reversals of category changes

Hello, next time you see some issue with my category edits please just let me know so I can fix the issues myself, instead of engaging in mass reversals which only make edits more complicated for everyone. Thanks, Nemo 19:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)