?

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.239.60.166 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

could someone explain this? I shouldn't be blocked because I have only good faith and useful edited. You want to be called out? I just want to improve here and live by WP:TRUTHMATTERS

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:13, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please FBI explain the reason for my block? I made a few edits - none were disruptive. I referenced reliable sources to make a claim. Can you explain my reason for my block? Then I will understand the block and I will continue to not cause damage or disruption and make useful contributions instead like eliminating the superfluous tag saying Brad Garlinghouse's page is anything other than up to the standards of wikipedia.. 96.239.60.166 (talk) 03:13, 5 March 2020 (UTC) @Yamla:Reply