92.1.205.192
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 92.1.205.192 in topic Greenock and sourcing
Greenock and sourcing edit
Hi - I appreciate what you're saying about it being speculative, but you can't insert commentary on sources without having another source. What you want is a more recent, reliable source, criticising Smith's viewpoint. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 16:58, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- That is a completely inappropriate demand. The is no expectation that one amateur writer writing in the 1920s would be rebutted, and I did not remove the claim. 92.1.205.192 (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |