October 2011 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Emiratisation, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Emiratisation was changed by 86.98.5.135 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920932 on 2011-10-30T09:20:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:20, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Jogi edit

You cannot add material unless you cite reliable sources. MatthewVanitas (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

{{unblock|reason= Content showing in Jogi was not accurate or there are missing information about origin, Movements, community motto, community members of other major part of India like UP, Rajasthan, Punjab, Gujarath, Mangalore. Where it shows actual history of the community, Ethnicity, Militancy, Jogis of Bramha Kshatriya. etc 86.98.5.135 (talk) 06:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)}Reply

January 2018 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Jogi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dl2000 (talk) 23:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jogi. - Arjayay (talk) 15:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 17:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


{{unblock|reason= Content showing in Jogi was not accurate or there are missing information about origin, Movements, community motto, community members of other major part of India like UP, Rajasthan, Punjab, Gujarath, Mangalore. Where it shows actual history of the community, Ethnicity, Militancy, Jogis of Bramha Kshatriya. etc 86.98.5.135 (talk) 06:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)}