85.211.114.101

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Stewart Brewing, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 21:27, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

• I didn't create it.

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Stewart Brewing. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 21:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Stewart Brewing. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Diego Grez (talk) 21:30, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Stewart Brewing. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Diego Grez (talk) 21:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

• I added a reference it has notability

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges, namely removing speedy deletion notices. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Connormah (talk) 21:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

85.211.114.101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why can't I remove the CSD template, I didn't create the article and it clearly claims notability.

Decline reason:

It doesn't really. Please follow guidelines laid down by experienced editors.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

,

I apologize, that was a bad block on my part - I've unblocked. The speedy has been declined, so you may continue working on the article - I offer my sincerest apologies. Connormah (talk) 22:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

In the future, though, it's never a good idea to repeatedly revert other users, even when you're sure they are wrong- it's called edit-warring here, and causes all sorts of problems. There's nothing that can be done at Wikipedia that can't be undone- even deletion- so there's always time to pause to discuss. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

This user is possibly editing under the IP 85.211.114.101 to avoid the block issued on the account of User talk:Stewartbrewing . A sockpuppet investgation (WP:SPI) has been requested, which if proven positive may lead to speedy deletion of the Stewart Brewing brewing article. --Kudpung (talk) 14:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stewartbrewing. Thank you. This user is possibly a sockpuppet of blocked User:Stewartbrewing Kudpung (talk) 15:38, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021

Hello, I'm SkiMaskA. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Duke of Edinburgh have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — SkiMaskA⭐ ^(💬Talk) 14:45, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Duke of Edinburgh. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:45, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

---