May 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Ed6767. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. "no consensus" is simply too vague for a rm like this. prev contrib had good reason to change. See WP:DRNC Ed6767 (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Ed6767: - the new graphics [1] are incorrect, very controversial, original research and must to be discussion and consensus for this. 84.10.242.48 (talk) 13:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for pointing that out. Apologies, I couldn't see the image as diff pages for template edits only show the wikitext change. The old map is better. Thank you for changing it back. Ed6767 (talk) 13:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020 edit

  Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:LordParsifal. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Ed6767 talk! 19:12, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.