USAA edit

Please refrain from editorializing and making grand claims without good sources as you did in this edit and this edit. Thanks --Matt (talk) 14:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oxfam America edit

I reverted your original text about Scarlett Johansson and Sodastream because you didn't provide a citation for your statement. You have reinstated the text but you have not provided a citation, so I am reverting the text again. Please do not reinstate it unless, and until, you have done the research to back up your statement and can quote its source. Headhitter (talk) 14:23, 25 January 2014 (UTCi

I have provided a reference from Haaretz newspaper. Seems you don don't notice that,

  • Wikipedia is neutral. If we state that something is illegal it's because it has been proved in a court in an appropriate jurisdiction. Otherwise an article might state that there was a controversy, provided this was backed up by reliable sources (see WP:RS), was stated in neutral terms (see WP:POV) and was of course completely relevant to the subject of the article. Your edits do not meet wikipedia's criteria and are not acceptable. Moreover your behaviour amounts to what is known as an "edit war". andy (talk) 17:49, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. andy (talk) 15:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.