Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (80.42.161.45) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Gnome de plume (talk) 15:00, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, 80.42.161.45. You have new messages at Superflewis's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, 80.42.161.45. You have new messages at Superflewis's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, 80.42.161.45. You have new messages at Superflewis's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.


Van Allen edit

Hi there, I think we finallly figured out what was happening at this page and at WP:EAR. You're not a vandal. You did get into an edit war, but it takes two to tango. If you haven't seen Arachnad's latest, then you should take a look. I'd also be grateful if you'd strikeout your comments about Superflewis's position on the material; I don't think there's any evidence that s/he had a position either way. Cheers, --AndrewHowse (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

3RR edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Van Allen radiation belt. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

  • Even with the best of intentions, editors can exceed the limit of three reverts in 24 hours. Please be careful in case admins start enforcing the rule on this article. EdJohnston (talk) 20:26, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply


Gastric bypass surgery edits edit

You recently edited this topic, and altered or deleted information which is sound and correct, regarding dumping syndrome, and the reported percentage of reduced mortality. I am inclined to revert your edits, but would consider your reasons for them before doing so. Please advise me regarding your reasoning and expertise on this topic. Topnife (talk) 05:36, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply