"Unnecessary section": Particular values of the Gamma function edit

Hi!

First of all, I would like to thank you for your work on the article as it improves readability.

As you may have noticed, the article does contain a lot of conjectures with connections to certain constants and the hypergeometric function. So I thought: "Why not add another conjecture which is based on actual proofs and highlights that higher denominators require more than the elliptic K function?"

Personally, I didn't feel comfortable with my edits so far, so I am glad that you reverted them.

(It feels a bit like two forces undoing each others actions :D)

However, I would still like to know: "What exactly about this section was unnecessary?"

(This reminds me of discussions 2 years ago about foreign alphabets and why nu looks like a pretzel by the way. I don't know why.) Jjzun (talk) 18:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply