February 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Houma, Louisiana— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cut Off, Louisiana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:37, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Galliano, Louisiana, you may be blocked from editing. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to New Orleans Saints. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:44, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Graphene— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 22:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Penile discharge appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 talk 07:48, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Nyook. An edit that you recently made to Nehalem (microarchitecture) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Nyook 16:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nehalem (microarchitecture), you may be blocked from editing. Mad Loux (talk) 16:25, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2023

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Multi-level marketing. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. That Coptic Guy (let's talk?) (contribs) 18:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply