75.80.104.155

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2010–2011 Middle East and North Africa protests, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 2010–2011 Middle East and North Africa protests was changed by 75.80.104.155 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.982489 on 2011-03-01T06:50:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Fearon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: James Fearon was changed by 75.80.104.155 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953001 on 2011-03-01T06:56:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to James Fearon. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 06:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Rationality. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at War's inefficiency puzzle, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: War's inefficiency puzzle was changed by 75.80.104.155 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866887 on 2011-03-01T07:02:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

07:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

I removed the new section you added to Prisoner's dilemma. The section had many buzzwords without supporting descriptions or links. I fear that the section was useless to the reader as it was. —Quantling (talk | contribs) 20:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to War's inefficiency puzzle, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Quantling (talk | contribs) 20:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Critical response

I noticed your recent edits to Thor: The Dark World. Your edits used the phrase "Thor: The Dark World recieved mixed to positive reviews" and I would recommend against using that phrasing since mixed by definition includes positive and negative reviews. I suggest that reviews should be described as mixed, or positive, or negative, but that you should pick only one of those choices. In any case another editor reverted your changes. -- 109.79.191.81 (talk) 22:06, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

---