72.198.49.108

Welcome!

Hello, 72.198.49.108, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Beliefs and ideology of Osama bin Laden

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Beliefs and ideology of Osama bin Laden), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! JustBerry (talk) 03:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to János Kádár

Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the János Kádár article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ivan Konev has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Japanese holdout, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 21:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Arab–Byzantine wars, you may be blocked from editing. Constantine ✍ 12:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alan Dershowitz. Also on Chuck Morse (journalist) - please read the rules on biographies of living persons before you edit again. -- Krelnik (talk) 13:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 13:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, I'm Jess. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Evolutionary origin of religions, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.   — Jess· Δ♥ 01:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016

Hello, I'm Donner60. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to America at a Crossroads seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Women to drive movement. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 05:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

America at a Crossroads. There is no need to negatively characterize American actions when explaining a series that deals with problems of American servicemen and similar topics. Perhaps more importantly, there is already a section about criticism to the show. That section is more than enough "balance" for conflicting views without tainting the entire article. I did not leave a further warning message because I am willing to assume your good faith but I think you should reconsider your position. If you have any further criticism from a reliable, verifiable, neutral source, I suggest you consider putting it in the appropriate section with a citation, provided that the addition is not so extensive as to overwhelm the description of the show. Also, Wikipedia does not change or distort or delete material from articles just because in someone's opinion the subject of an article or someone who is written about in the article (or quoted in the article) does not agree with their opinion. That is at least part of the point of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Donner60 (talk) 02:29, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Roman-Persian Wars.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Racism in Saudi Arabia. Donner60 (talk) 01:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Can I advise you to start making use of article talk pages. It is clear from your edit history that you know what talk pages are, because you use other editors' talk pages. My advice is that next time you want to edit an article, instead of editing the article, try explaining your proposed edit on the article's talk page. If nobody objects after 24 hours, then make the edit to the article.

At the moment you have got yourself locked into an edit-warring cul-de-sac. You will be more successful if you change your editting-behaviours.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for evading a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:58, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

@Opabinia regalis: It looks like a longer block will be needed. Sro23 (talk) 17:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

It looks like liars need to get off of my page. Your attacks will not work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.198.49.108 (talk)

• Be careful with edit summaries like this. If you are going to accuse another user of sock puppetry, please make sure you have some strong evidence to back the claim up. Otherwise, the unfounded allegation could be viewed as a personal attack. —C.Fred (talk) 17:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for evading a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Opabinia regalis (talk) 20:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2017

Hello, I'm Thompson.matthew. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Oriana Fallaci seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me!} 03:52, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Sotirios Gotzamanis, you may be blocked from editing. Constantine ✍ 20:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017

Hello, I'm Howicus. I noticed that you made a change to an article, White movement, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 20:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Tomorrow's Pioneers.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. SahabAliwadia 10:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User:SahabAliwadia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SahabAliwadia 09:27, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not falsely accuse people of disruptive editing as you did at User talk:SahabAliwadia. If you continue this behavior you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TheNewSMG (talk) 12:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

-Matter of fact,I did not make these edits, because the IP was used by somone else. Hope this confusion is cleared up. 72.198.49.108 (talk) 22:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

If blockable edits continue from this IP we'll have to block it. If others are using this IP they can create an account which will make them more anonymous. Doug Weller talk 05:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 10:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

---