October 2008

edit

  This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, you will be blocked from editing. (GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)-- 08:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.99.127.141 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

not a vandalism-revert war, see talk page for Czech Republic article about nonexistent short name in English language!

Decline reason:

I saw a very interesting discussion about whether or not that name should be the main title of the article. Nothing there indicated that the name was nonexistent; you yourself appear never to have posted to that talk page, though you do seem to be edit-warring over the point. When your block expires, try getting other users to agree with you on the talk page, using reason and sources. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:09, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Personal attack removed) 71.99.127.141 (talk) 22:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Would you like to hear something amusing? If you had followed the rules, discussing your desired change instead of edit-warring over it, I would have agreed with you that a change was needed. And if you hadn't insulted me, I would be at Czech Republic right now, helping you to explain your case and supporting you. But since you broke the rules against edit-warring, you're blocked, and since you insulted me, I'm not going to help you. I guess it's true what my mother taught me when I was young, and good manners really are the best way to get what you want. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:36, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

MythBusters

edit

Please stop restoring that information to MythBusters (season 3). Information based on your own personal observations or opinions is original research and not permitted on Wikipedia. Please provide reliable sources that have made the observations in regards to those particular experiments.--Drat (Talk) 07:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kateřina Jacques, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Stop deleting German names

edit

Stop deleting German names.-- Matthead  Discuß   17:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply