Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tendai, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jikaku (talk) 04:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 2008 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jikaku (talk) 12:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Jikaku (talk) 12:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jikaku (talk) 12:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. --Jikaku (talk) 12:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tendai. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 01:29, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

September/October 2008 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jikaku (talk) 12:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jikaku (talk) 12:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jikaku (talk) 12:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jikaku (talk) 12:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


Not vandalism... edit

And anyone who reads the edit would not think so. I will continue to post the edit to warn individuals who are interested in tendai buddhism to research teachers and corporate entities before committing to a teacher. An individual with the username of "jikaku", however, is associated with an individual who was found to misrepresent himself as being an "ajari" and was, himself advertising that he was a fully ordained "soryo" (and is a webmaster/designer of the websites in question.)

If that is the case, and you are that individual, then I would understand why a "warning" would concern you.

It is obvious that a general warning for individuals to perform due diligence offends your personal agenda and views. 71.255.232.203 (talk) 01:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, generally when making comments regarding you and your own edits - it's easier to leave them on your own talk page (you could have done that when you were deleting all those warnings you've received). In any case, an encyclopedia entry isn't the place to "warn" people about groups or individuals you don't like. If you want to put up your own website for that purpose, more power to you - but unless your information is relevant and verifiable accoridng to wiki sources, there's no place for it here. And please don't think this is something personal on my part (as it appears you do) - your unsourced "warning" is precisely the kind of material that's prohibited by wiki's NPOV policy, and that's why it's removed (by me and others). I'll add this over on your own talk page as well, which is where further discussion on this matter should take place. --Jikaku (talk) 20:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply