Reply:Twinkle Rollback edit
Seems like you have an account. I left an edit summary when removing the speedy deletion, the article did not meet the criteria you specified unless otherwise.Please have a look at WP:GNG and if it does does not meet that criteria put it up for AfD. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talkđ§) 06:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- No problem with you disagreeing on whether A7 or even GNG is applicable. My problem is with your use of rollback to express it. 69.124.61.163 (talk) 11:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi - just weighing in here, the problem with using 'proper' rollback for edits like that is the lack of edit summary. There's nothing wrong with using Twinkle to undo the addition of a CSD tag, provided an explanatory edit summary is provided (which it was in this case). GirthSummit (blether) 16:34, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- edit summary was âNominate for speedy deletion a7â 69.124.61.163 (talk) 19:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- What I meant was that an edit summary should be used when removing the CSD template. Megan's edit summary was
Article meets WP:GNG, if in doubt put it up at AFD instead of speedy delete
, which seems sufficiently explanatory to me. The question of whether or not the subject meets GNG isn't technically relevant of course, the issue when considering an A7 is whether there is any claim (even an unsourced one) that would satisfy WP:SIGNIF, but regardless, I don't see any reason why one shouldn't use Twinkle to do this provided an edit summary is provided. GirthSummit (blether) 07:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- What I meant was that an edit summary should be used when removing the CSD template. Megan's edit summary was
- edit summary was âNominate for speedy deletion a7â 69.124.61.163 (talk) 19:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi - just weighing in here, the problem with using 'proper' rollback for edits like that is the lack of edit summary. There's nothing wrong with using Twinkle to undo the addition of a CSD tag, provided an explanatory edit summary is provided (which it was in this case). GirthSummit (blether) 16:34, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 edit
Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rey Manaj without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:13, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- I did leave an adequate edit summary. Did you not see it? 69.124.61.163 (talk) 11:14, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 edit
Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Zain Walker article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 15:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry snowman, I donât have a better source than the website I linked to. 69.124.61.163 (talk) 15:44, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |