Recent edit to Aardman filmography edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Aardman filmography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2020 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Glitch Techs, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 00:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm YoungForever. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Close Enough, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 20:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020 edit

Please stop using unreliable sources to "validate" innaccurate information on The Boss Baby: Family Business. It is really getting bothersome. Also, even after being told to stop this, you ignore these clear warnings and push onward anyway. This needs to stop now. Cardei012597 (talk) 23:36, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BOVINEBOY2008 09:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, DreamWorks Animation Television, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Jonathan Aibel and Glenn Berger. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 18:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

October 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to FloopaLoo, Where Are You?—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Geoff | Who, me? 22:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Croods: A New Age, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Do not use unreliable sources like FilmMusicReporter for your edits. BOVINEBOY2008 00:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.