User talk:5theye/Archive Apr 2008
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Album article assessments
Hi. :) With regards to your request for an album article assessment of Boredoms discography, discography articles can't be assessed by current album article criteria, which are specifically designed for album articles. (If you look over it, you'll see that by default on the project's quality scale the article would have to be rated a stub, since it doesn't include any of the elements necessary even for a start rating, like track listings.) You might want to consider requesting a re-assessment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music. You mentioned wanting feedback on how to format the list, as the albums are released on different labels. I don't know if there's a standard for discography articles, but perhaps a table would serve? I had a glance at The Beatles discography, and that's what they seem to do there. The only guideline suggestions I found for discography articles are here, and they don't really offer much. :/ --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. Good luck with it. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Boredoms - (circle).ogg
Thanks for uploading Image:Boredoms - (circle).ogg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Just wanted to let you know that Strapping Young Lad is a featured article candidate, so feel free to comment! Gocsa (talk) 14:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)