514Charlie

Welcome!

Hi 514Charlie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Robby.is.on (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Post-nominal formatting

Hi 514Charlie, this was not a clean up as the formatting of post-nominals should be maintained as found, even if adding the template. As per MOS:POSTNOM:

Where this manual provides options, consistency should be maintained within an article unless there is a good reason to do otherwise. The Arbitration Committee has ruled that editors should not change an article from one guideline-defined style to another without a substantial reason unrelated to mere choice of style, and that revert-warring over optional styles is unacceptable. If discussion cannot determine which style to use in an article, defer to the style used by the first major contributor.

Therefore, please make sure to maintain consistency within a article when editing post-nominals: this includes commas and sizing. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 18:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Heya Gaia Octavia Agrippa,

Fair point about consistency re: sizing and commas. However, later in the MOS we have the following passage:

This manual formatting is only needed for cases where {{post-nominals}} does not handle the abbreviation in question.

Thus, should the piped links be replaced with the template so long as the post-nominal letters exist within that country's preset list? Or does the "editors should not change an article from one guideline-defined style" trump this guidance?

On a related note, I do think it's worth revisiting commas outside specific cases (e.g. baronetcies and peerages) since it does create some weird interactions when hovering over a link. In Alston-Roberts-West's case, the following text is displayed: Lieutenant-Colonel George Arthur Alston-Roberts-West,, also known as George West, [...]. However, this isn't the forum to discuss :)

Thanks! 514Charlie (talk) 11:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Victor M. Power

On 10 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Victor M. Power, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)