Aggressive blocking by Materialscientist edit

Yes, there are errors in the recent English spelling reform edits, but this is a tricky, uncharted subject and I seriously doubt whether Materialscientist has the skills and knowledge to make the appropriate corrections unaided. There are too many trigger-happy admins on Wikipedia, and calling it 'vandalism' is typical but uncalled for.--5.150.92.174 (talk) 17:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Similarity between Wikipedia and Nazism edit

The Nazis came and punished whole communities harshly for the actions of one or two dissidents. The Wikipedia admins came and punished whole communities harshly for the actions of one or two dissidents.--5.150.92.174 (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Satellizer. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of most viewed YouTube videos— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Satellizer (´ ・ ω ・ `) 10:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Wikiisawesome. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wood block— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. /wia /tlk 16:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Samba with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. /wia /tlk 16:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Samba with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. /wia /tlk 16:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Samba. /wia /tlk 16:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 16:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

March 2017 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Genocide are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brian Eno, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 11:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.