Pradal serey v. Kun khmer edit

The article currently about the subject is titled Pradal serey. If you think the title should be changed, you'll need to request for the article to be moved. You'll need to demonstrate that the common name of the subject, in English usage, is kuh khmer to get that change to go through. —C.Fred (talk) 02:49, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@C.Fred I've begun to issue disruptive editing warnings as you've explained the proper process. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2023 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Kun khmer, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:49, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kun khmer. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Kun khmer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 02:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Philipnelson99. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —C.Fred (talk) 02:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  • You have a choice to make here: you can engage in constructive discussion, or you can continue to edit war and make personal attacks against other editors. If you choose the path of disruptive editing, you will be blocked from editing to prevent further disruption. —C.Fred (talk) 02:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 03:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.