2604:2000:E016:A700:B49B:7B31:1E5:3777

March 2018

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chmielewski have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 19:06, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• It is a completely proper edit. You have failed completely to assert why it is not. --2604:2000:E016:A700:B49B:7B31:1E5:3777 (talk) 19:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chmielewski, you may be blocked from editing. PabloMartinez (talk) 19:09, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Pablo - How is that possibly "vandalism"? It is an accurate and appropriate edit. 2604:2000:E016:A700:B49B:7B31:1E5:3777 (talk) 19:10, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

The edits were in no way vandalism; I've struck the L3 warning.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:37, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks. Can someone put my material back?

Also - this all started with a similar vandalism-rooted (I think problematic) use of tools by Student. If you look at his talk page, it is full of editors being put upon by similar use of tools on his part. With some odd efforts at explanation (or sometimes apologies) by him. Perhaps you may be interested in looking at that as well. Starting at the most recent comments at the bottom, here - User talk:CLCStudent. 2604:2000:E016:A700:B49B:7B31:1E5:3777 (talk) 19:43, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

It's unfortunate that you became caught up in some overzealous reverting through the use of automated anti-vandalism tools. At the end of the day what's very important is not being infallible, but how others react when errors or misjudgements are pointed out to them. In this case CLCStudent apologized when asked about the revert. Pablomartinez has yet to respond so I suppose we'll see how that goes.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks. I'm sure this seems silly to you Ponyo, and it is small in the scheme of things, but if it is happening to me maybe it is happening to others, and it is the sort of thing that without your help makes good editors not contribute so your help is important. 2604:2000:E016:A700:B49B:7B31:1E5:3777 (talk) 21:03, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

---