2603:8000:D300:D0F:ECFD:2826:F5CF:5433

Welcome!

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Dušan Rajović! If you are interested in editing more often, I suggest you create an account to gain additional privileges. Happy editing! Paulpat99 (talk) 03:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks as well for your error correction on GSI Mariner! Daniel Case (talk) 17:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

And here, too! Good eye! Daniel Case (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

"Eye" has nothing to do with it. It is all procedure and using the electronic tools capability of WP. I do not care about lists of commonly misspelled words because my method does not rely on knowing how to spell words. If you start off with an already misspelled word then so a "quotes" search to find the same elsewhere. Then apply the following procedure to the corrected word in quotes but insert a space between the second to last and last character. Search. Correct. Replace the second to last character with the last. Search, Correct. Replace the second to last character with the removed character. Search. Correct.Then just continue replacing the next leftward character with the just previously eliminated character until you reach the first character but insert a space in the same pattern as from the start when you worked from the end leftward. Then move the first character to the second position in quotes. Search, Correct. Move the first character over two positions. Search. Correct. Move the character that just moved leftward to the right two positions. Search. Correct. This way you get characters that have been missed in the first sweep then in the second you get characters that have been misplaced. Sometimes the pool of hits can be daunting so review your hits and try to find a commonality among them and include that word as an associated search. Once you are done with the associated search pool then "-" it to remove those from the pool. Repeat the pool of hits for another refined pool of hits and correct. Use the search to find the word in the text but remember that coding can create what appears to be a misspelling and is not. Along the way you find run-ons, badly structured expressions, redundant expressions, contractions, bad translations, etc. It is not the "academically" trained way to edit but for the right mind set it works. Always pass along a misspelling because it cuts down on me deciding what to move onto next.2603:8000:D300:D0F:ECFD:2826:F5CF:5433 (talk) 21:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Beoga, you may be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 17:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Dont be brash. I am not surprised the time was not taken to see this involves a locked article. Redeem yourself.2603:8000:D300:D0F:ECFD:2826:F5CF:5433 (talk) 17:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

It might help if, rather than just a header, you left a message indicating that there is a typo in the article, and where in the article it can be found. —C.Fred (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

I do not wish to discuss any longer the short comings displaced in your evaluation process.2603:8000:D300:D0F:ECFD:2826:F5CF:5433 (talk) 17:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

It was misunderstood as it was not clear what the edit was about, to anyone looking in it seemed just like a disruptive meaningless edit. If you wish to suggest an edit in future, please say what it is you're looking for in the form of "please change X to Y because of Z" instead of just putting a couple of words for which it is not obvious what the intent was. Canterbury Tail talk 20:41, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Perception very well may have been the motivation of that opinion but that is not universally held by those that have through their own devices progressed through the intent of a talk page associated with an article and being presented with a sequence follow through to at least afford a good faith effort at looking at the article which in this case was locked. Maybe being locked is not such a great device. Or do you prefer everyone viewing WP jump through the same hoops? This is not a challenge but something that from time to time WP and those more invested in its "routine" reevaluate. And please have some respect for others and not bring up the issue of a registered username.2603:8000:D300:D0F:ECFD:2826:F5CF:5433 (talk) 21:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

No one is talking about registered usernames here. Are you replying to the right message? Canterbury Tail talk 01:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

It is unfortunate but I do not know what is the point. Unless you are out to pick a fight, move on. I am not and have.2603:8000:D300:D0F:ECFD:2826:F5CF:5433 (talk) 02:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Olympiacos F.C.. Those aren't the demonyms for those, they are American, French and Spanish respectively, as I'm sure you know. Your comments above actually suggest that you know that you are not improving the article. It would be like saying that Babe Ruth was a "United States baseball player", come on, you can't be serious. In fact, you really can't. You clearly have a good enough grasp of English to understand demonyms, and yet are still doing this. Next stop, WP:AIV. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Oh, so you want to restore that after I removed it? Fine, do so, whatever floats your boat. I find it quite ironic that immediately above you mention about how you aren't out to pick fights and had moved on. Goodbye. I hope that I never cross your path again. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If you are interested in picking fights you will have to find another victim. Restoring the record was not an open invitation to again jump the gun with expressions of ignorance. What it looks like is that the claim of disruptive editing is just another ready tool by editors. I have yet to read how is it being disruptive correcting grammatically incorrect and obsolete article titles? It still remains a mystery as to what is the problem; not liking the new WP standards or not knowing about them? "I hope that I never cross your path again.". does not sound very cooperative in the WP environment. Does that mean edits suggested to WP go unnoticed without the presence of knee jerk actions then followed-up with further expressions of negativity. Save your integrity. Stop.2603:8000:D300:D0F:ECFD:2826:F5CF:5433 (talk) 20:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi. I'm Train and unicorn fan. I saw that you vandalized, like this edit to Canberk Kuş. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thanks. Train and unicorn fan🦄🚆 talk 07:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Plus, I did not correctly do the edit summary as I don't know how to do the manual revert Train and unicorn fan🦄🚆 talk

Train and unicorn fan (talk) 07:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

You admit to being young and inexperienced. It might be to your advantage to understand the difference between vandalism and miss action so that what integrity you do have is not further diminished by what may appear a knee jerk reaction. Is the message sent a template or of your own creation? In the WP environment there seems to be a tendency to jump to the use of vandalism, maybe if that is what is sent is a template. Unless you know for certain what is the situation then do not throw yourself off the cliff before finding out that a remedy is not too late. WP is an electronic environment and not everything that gets done is accomplished by the person who's username or IP address has been used. I am certain that you are familiar with hacking? So do you want to be the person that accuses someone of vandalism when they did not do it? And if they did not then it would be better for you to be the person that tells them that what you have found may not have been done under the authorship of the accused. That way you do not come out the villain because in an electronic environment you have only one chance to set the tone. You never want to be at the end of a situation that you have taken a misstep. And then to say use the sandbox is sort of gratuitous because if you have made a bad impression then why would anyone take recommendations from you seriously. Oh, if the reason why the edit made was chosen I would suggest that you give yourself some time to become familiar with what vandalisms occure under an IP and not just a miss-edit.2603:8000:D300:D0F:D5D:8295:289E:24F5 (talk) 03:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Deleting referenced material

Please do not remove valid referenced material as you did on this edit. Balkan Games is an alternative name for them, something referenced in the article, and it has a valid redirect to the main article for the same term. If you do have valid cause to remove information, please provide an edit summary that explains why it is being deleted (but again do not delete something that is clearly referenced.) Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 20:15, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Twinworld

I reverted your edit to the article Twinworld. The name of the level group is really spelled "Swamps of Montain", not "Swamps of Mountain". That is also why there is the template "Proper name" in the article source text. JIP | Talk 22:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

---