2603:7000:2143:8500:BCE6:9F4B:E3D8:9A43

March 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Department of Social Policy and Intervention, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nightenbelle (talk) 16:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Please explain what you believe was non constructive about it. 2603:7000:2143:8500:BCE6:9F4B:E3D8:9A43 (talk) 16:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

You added the word fact- in template tags. Adding this did nothing to improve the article other than take up space. If you want to improve an article- add sources, or add information, do not add random- made upt templates to articles. Thank you. Nightenbelle (talk) 16:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

The template was created for precisely this purpose. The material does not belong uncited. It is subject to immediate deletion - which of course I could properly do. Adding a cite needed tag - created for that purposed - is totally appropriate, and the less abrupt treatment. It is not a "random made up template." It is widely used at the project, for a decade at least.

To ensure that all Wikipedia content is verifiable, anyone may question an uncited claim. If your work has been tagged, please provide a reliable source for the statement, and discuss if needed.

Please self-revert, or I will revert. The burden is not on me to supply RS sourcing. But on the one restoring the content. See wp:burden.2603:7000:2143:8500:BCE6:9F4B:E3D8:9A43 (talk) 16:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

---