Please remove your last two edits to the ANI discussion as they have just messed up the dialogue. Deb (talk) 16:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pasted below -- not sure how it messed things up but here's my response edit

No, I do not have a conflict. That was why I was blocked for editing for two weeks, but if you look at the content it's balanced, and I created a lot. I have no financial or professional connection to the school. I know a lot about it and have researched a lot about it, and want to share that relevant info. Bullying is a problem specific to the school as illustrated by tons of books and even the school's own trainings. It's difficult to experience so much resistance to good material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:8300:C6D0:356C:E335:9D83:E990 (talk) 16:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

2601:645:8300:C6D0:356C:E335:9D83:E990 (talk) 16:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

You haven't created any material that meets our standards. Please go and read the guidelines before attempting to contribute further. Deb (talk) 16:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2601:645:8300:C6D0:356C:E335:9D83:E990 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The block may have come because I made a user acccount as other editors had asked when I was blocked as an IP. Either way I think this block is a mistake and I have in my new username factsforsure44 in the sandbox down a draft of the Katherine Delmar Burke's page that is at the exact template provided for schools. I'd like this to be edited, not blocked. In this case I think the block is partially censorship. I tried to have my draft article edited but they said to appeal the block rather than circumvent. If you can, please look at the content in the sandbox. It's good and shouldn't be kept on hold for dubious reasons. I will not be disruptive; I've learned more; the process of huge sections being removed wholesale when there was good info was frustrating as was the school's and other IPS attempts to take out anything that tainted reputation. My intent is to provide good info, not to have conflict. 2601:645:8300:C6D0:356C:E335:9D83:E990 (talk) 20:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This block does not affect you, so long as you sign in with your account. Knock off the hyperbole. Yamla (talk) 12:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.