2600:387:9:5:0:0:0:C0

June 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harvey Mudd College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Onion, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 13:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – Gilliam (talk) 13:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Palatka, Florida has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Palatka, Florida was changed by 2600:387:9:5:0:0:0:C0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952696 on 2017-09-28T21:17:02+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 was changed by 2600:387:9:5:0:0:0:C0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960219 on 2017-10-03T18:49:48+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:49, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 18:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

15:16, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. – Gilliam (talk) 00:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Target Canada, you may be blocked from editing. See this letter from its president on 4 July 2018 contradicting your claim: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/letters_to_the_editors/2018/07/04/toys-r-us-canada-still-here.html Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 22:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2019

Hello, I'm Mosrod. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Cutthroat (pool)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Mosrod^Talk 02:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Hello, I'm TAnthony. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Man in the High Castle (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please find a reliable external source that discusses your extended facts. If they are not notable enough to be mentioned by reliable sources, they are not notable enough for inclusion. Do no restore this information again without providing such sources. Thanks. — TAnthony^Talk 18:40, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

And as I said in my edit summary, prop maps are NOT reliable sources because they require interpretation and original research. For example, you are clearly misinterpreting the use of Reich on the maps; the other countries don't necessarily call themselves that, it is a German map designating these regions as such. Either way, it relies on our opinions, which is unacceptable.— TAnthony^Talk 18:43, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

---