24.15.68.186

June 2016

Hello, I'm TheDwellerCamp. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mouth (song) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheDwellerCamp (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

hey

Sorry about that. I just checked. I should not have sent that message. You do well in undoing stuff. :) Can I suggest an account? TheDwellerCamp (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (24.15.68.186) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Linguist 111 If you reply here, please ping me. 15:28, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Agaricus deserticola. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fuortu (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Agaricus deserticola, you may be blocked from editing. Fuortu (talk) 21:12, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Agaricus deserticola. Fuortu (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

i was just playing around 24.15.68.186 (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 21:25, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.15.68.186 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry about the vandalism. My cousins were visiting.

Decline reason:

This is an example of WP:NOTME. I'm sorry your cousins ruined this for you. This may be a good opportunity for you to discuss how their actions are harming you. Unfortunately, as we cannot validate your claim and have no reason to believe they'll never again use this IP address, we will be leaving the block in place. Yamla (talk) 11:55, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Favonian: ^read^ 24.15.68.186 (talk) 05:30, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.15.68.186 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

A little bit of vandalism doesn't justify a 4 month block.

Decline reason:

Quite a lot of vandalism, as this is a CheckUser block. Talk page access revoked. Favonian (talk) 15:23, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also involved

@Materialscientist: also

January 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:57, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.15.68.186 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Place any further information here. 24.15.68.186 (talk) 23:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Regardless of whether the proxy assessment is correct (it appears to be), this IP is still directly blocked for repeated long-term vandalism. Yunshui ^雲_水 09:01, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---