February 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm Skarz. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of deemed universities without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. skarz (talk) 07:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Sjö. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sjö (talk) 08:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Regarding your revert on Talk:Daylight saving time edit

Is there a reason you are removing this talk page comment? To me that looks like a genuine question and not vandalism, but I may be missing something. 🐈 Nyakase 🐈 08:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 09:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Shaking my head at this. Absolutely UNACCEPTABLE edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

223.136.86.208 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What planet are you living on?! I was REVERTING vandalism, not instigating it you utter FOOL. Right, that's it...I DEMAND that Izno be blocked instead to make up for this egregious error!!! 223.136.86.208 (talk) 10:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.