May 2007 edit

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Royal Canadian Air Cadets. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sancho 18:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

June 2007 edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Event planning. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you. andy 16:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

August 2007 edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to University of Guelph. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Danelo 20:21, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

September 2007 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Crayfish, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Crayfish was changed by 216.171.96.18 (c) (t) replacing content with 'Pat is a ass and she sucks' on 2007-09-24T16:49:24+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 20:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for block evasion and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 00:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of sockpuppet accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 00:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2008 edit

 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nicolaus Copernicus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 17:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment please use the sandbox. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 17:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Nicolaus Copernicus. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoygabsadds 17:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 18:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

April 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Guelph, Ontario do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 18:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 14:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008 edit

  Your recent edit to Tommy Lee (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 21:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Tommy Lee constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. IRP 21:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Tommy Lee. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

January 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to De revolutionibus orbium coelestium has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Commentariolus constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. King of ♠ 01:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to American Astronomical Society has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Williams College constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Humanities. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. William Avery (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Social sciences. William Avery (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked for a period of 6 months from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 19:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Guelph, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ~NerdyScienceDude () 16:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2010 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nintendo DS. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 20:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2011 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Angel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:EdJohnston. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Phileasson. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Star Trek because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Phileasson (talk) 16:29, 3 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2015 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Plurality (voting). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. User:HopsonRoad 23:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

September 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Encyclopedia of World History— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cam Guthrie—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 15:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply