November 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Abigail Williams has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

January 2014 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Rhyme scheme has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

June 2014 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ottoman Empire has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ottoman Empire with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 15:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ottoman architecture.  —SMALLJIM  16:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Causes of World War I with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 16:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Military history of the United Kingdom during World War II, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Military history of the United Kingdom during World War II was changed by 207.160.238.249 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957097 on 2014-06-23T19:19:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Gobonobo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Somalia because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. gobonobo + c 14:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Juno (mythology) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Dan6hell66. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Human papillomavirus— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. D6h! ? 16:40, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Banjo did not appear constructive, and will be undone if not undone already. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bleeding Kansas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 19:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2016 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Rogers Clark. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 17:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Eteethan. I noticed that in this edit to United States Air Force, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eteethan(talk) 21:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

December 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Xyzspaniel. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Schenck v. United States have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. XyzSpaniel Talk Page 21:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wayne Shorter has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Talk:Wayne Shorter, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 07:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Kinetic37. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bulldog have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Kinetic37 (talk) 18:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2018 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Health administration has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2019 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carlisle Barracks, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 19:43, 8 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2020 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Athenian military has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:06, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2023 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Tyreek Hill, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 20:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2023 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Secret police. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:56, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2024 edit

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Attack on Pearl Harbor. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Do not change to itals, without reason and no pic visable (despite caption) David J Johnson (talk) 19:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The story of James fredrick polomo Carter (April 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 207.160.238.249! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply