202.45.68.57

Original research in Hutchison Whampoa

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as those in Hutchison Whampoa, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! —Dgies^t c 16:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to Hutchison Whampoa, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. —Dgies^t c 07:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hutchison Whampoa, you will be blocked from editing. —Dgies^t c 13:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Hutchison Whampoa

Hi, I see you are making the exact same edits as Maviswwc. If you continue reverting this manner you may be blocked as a sockpuppet engaging in WP:3RR evasion. —dgies^t_c 04:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Maviswwc for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. —dgies^t_c 05:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Hutchison Whampoa, you will be blocked from editing. —dgies^t_c 16:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello, I'm 1AmNobody24. I noticed that you recently removed content from Li Ka Shing Foundation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nobody (talk) 08:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

---