185.14.215.74

This IP address has been blocked temporarily, because sockpuppet investigation evidence has determined that this IP address was used abusively; the address has been blocked to prevent further abuse. If you are a registered user and you're seeing this message, then please post {{unblock|reason for unblock here}} on your talk page, with a note referencing this message. Please be sure to include this IP address in your note. Administrators: Please consult with the administrator who placed the block before unblocking.

Daniel Case (talk) 06:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Apologies/others

I sincerely apologise for the message i left regarding you at :@MYS77:'s page. Not correct on two accounts, not being in English when mentioning another user and the language used there. Regarding that, two notes: 1 - he re-reverted because he wanted, i did not force him to engage in any action; 2 - must i remind you how many times you called me a vandal, when i'm the exact opposite of that (i may be one of the poorest editors from an "English user at the English WP"'s standpoint, but a vandal?)? All in all, my actions were not all that they could have been at that point in time, but really no need for me to read about the Dunning–Kruger effect, never thought of me as one who knows more than anyone about anything!

Ah, these parting words: from now on, no need to worry about my incompetence (regarding you and possibly a few others, never heard of more than one, won't name him to avoid more antagonism, some people accuse me of not being able to handle criticism then do exactly the same, never acknowledging for any errors whatsoever) ruining articles at WP and my "long term systematic effort to undermine the [site's] integrity" (your words not mine; i was blocked once in 14 years, yes, for incivility, totally deserved), i am retired since last week. With editors such as yourself, the project is in safe hands.

Goodbye (and again apologies for the tone of the message in MYS77's page) --Quite A Character (talk) 04:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

If you could write in comprehensible English, I might understand the point of your message. 185.14.215.74 (talk) 18:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

OK, tried to apologise for my actions (message about you in another language) and reach out, again you were having none of that. Maybe "f*** off troll" you understand? Goodbye, continue the "good" work. --Quite A Character (talk) 20:53, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

You've spent years, using multiple different accounts as well as editing anonymously, deliberately screwing up English Wikipedia. Your idiotic construction of "X played as a Y, and the manager of Z" means that X played as the manager of Z. Years ago, you pretended that you understood this, and yet your vandalism continued. You are not as bad as the kid who took over Scots Wikipedia despite no meaningful knowledge of the language, but your cultural vandalism is on the same spectrum. If you really have stopped editing, then it's to English Wikipedia's great benefit, though I strongly suspect you are merely attention seeking, and will be back to your vandalistic ways under this or another username before too long.

If some iota of this has managed to get through your absurdly thick skull, and you feel in some way contrite for spending years forcing grammar errors into an encyclopaedia for English speakers, then go and fix them. All the edits of mine that you undid out of sheer arrogance, or got other cultural vandals to undo for you, should be restored. No doubt, there are hundreds of other articles that you screwed up. So quit your "look at me, I'm leaving!" act, and go fix the damage you have done. 185.14.215.74 (talk) 18:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

As predicted, the user was nowhere near intelligent enough to even understand their English language failings, and they continue their campaign to damage Wikipedia using IP addresses, long after their attention-seeking claim to have left. That they have been doing this unhindered for well over a decade is truly damning. They and their enablers are the absolute worst kind of vandals. 185.14.215.74 (talk) 17:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

185.14.215.74 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

a two year block of a single IP address obviously violates the blocking policy. Whoever this block was targeted at is long gone.

Decline reason:

No policy is violated here, as far as I can see. It's only indefinite blocks that are frowned upon. Yamla (talk) 11:42, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

185.14.215.74 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Actually all sorts of policies are being violated. This is a dynamically assigned IP so it's almost impossible for it to affect whichever one person it was targeted at. A two year block of a dynamically assigned IP is crazy. It's not going to prevent anything. It is an attempt to be punitive that can't even work. 185.14.215.74 (talk) 13:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Blocks are preventative, not punitive. We know that there is no perfect way to keep certain users off Wikipedia, but that is not a reason to not try, just as no law by a government is 100% effective. . Either you are innocent and may request an account at WP:ACC, or you aren't and will go on doing what you are doing. Either way, there is nothing more to do here. 331dot (talk) 13:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---