To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

August 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Pharaohs in the Bible, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 18:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Why are you offensive telling me an inaccuracy instead of a direct link to my removal: "The page "History for now" does not exist."?

Discussion concerning an edit of yours edit

is at WP:ANI#IP suggesting that an author should sue an editor. Doug Weller talk 17:43, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

August 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Twsx. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Hebrews that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ twsx | talkcont | ~ 18:04, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 18:32, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm Khruner. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Merneptah Stele seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Khruner (talk) 17:18, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Merneptah Stele. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Khruner (talk) 23:41, 31 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Merneptah Stele, you may be blocked from editing. Would you stop putting your personal, unsourced analysis on this artefact? Khruner (talk) 10:45, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Merneptah Stele. Fore the last time: provide a reliable source backing your claims, or avoid putting your original research, once and for all. Khruner (talk) 18:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2021 edit

I've just added this to Euryalus' talk page: APOLOGY

Dear Euryalus, after having been surprised by your term "dramatic", I thought over this reaction, to conclude that you must be Jewish and opposed to the thesis that the Hebrews were mere Egyptians. So, I was wrong to speak of French phobia; it is Israel philia. Therefore, the fact - that may not be called a thesis - that the last six commandments are excerpted from the Negative confession shocks your sensivity. Please, consider that an encyclopedia must tell the truth, however unpleasant to some it may be.

  Hello, I'm Dewritech. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ten Commandments, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dewritech (talk) 12:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Johnuniq (talk) 22:32, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Edit warring at Ten Commandments is not permitted and neither are violations of WP:CIVIL (diff). Discuss disagreements on the article talk page. Johnuniq (talk) 22:32, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

== 20 December == This is the information that was censored:

According to Desroches Noblecourt, "the precise reference to the ten commandments is found at the time of the pyramids." She was alluding to the negative confession of the Texts of the pyramids (a thousand years before Moses) where the last six commandments can indeed be found (the first four are the monotheist ones).[145]

If, on the one hand, Mrs Desroches Noblecourt, the most famous Egyptologist in the world (and in history after Herodotus), is not a reliable source, if, on the second hand, Le Figaro Magazine (the French equivalent of Time Magazine) is not reliable either, then, your French phobia is obvious, and I will certainly not edit any longer by your side.

What allows me to tell that you and our friend Connelly are Francophobic is that the French wikipedia accepted the information: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9calogue#Datation

Actually, it should be placed at the very top of the article, which should be accepted in some time (presently too sensitive).

That information is a major one. It is obviously the victim of extraordinary censorship (Zionist?).

Finally, no, I'm certainly not going to appeal or any other kind of action against Francophobia.

Mrs. Desroches Noblecourt is the autor of these 38 books:

Le style égyptien, Larousse, coll. « Arts, Styles et Techniques », 1940.

L'Art égyptien au Musée du Louvre, Paris, Librairie Floury, 1941.$

Avec K. Michalowski, Tell-Edfou 1939. Fouilles franco-polonaises, III, IFAO, Le Caire, 1950.

L'art égyptien, PUF, 1962 ;

Toutânkhamon, vie et mort d'un pharaon, 1963.

Peintures des tombeaux et des temples égyptiens, Paris, Flammarion, coll. « Le Grand art en livre de poche », 1962.

Vie et mort d'un pharaon, Toutânkhamon, Paris, Hachette, 1963 (réimpr. 1976).

Dieux et temples de Dakke en Nubie perdue, coll. « Archéologia no 1 », novembre - décembre 1964.

Toutânkhamon et son temps, Petit Palais, Paris, Paris, Réunion des Musées Nationaux, coll. « Archéologia no 15 », 1967.

Avec C. Kuentz, Le petit temple d'Abou Simbel (2 vol.), Le Caire, 1968;

Avec M. Neslon et Chr. Leblanc, Ramsès II le Grand, Exposition au Grand Palais, Paris, Presses artistiques, coll. « Archéologia = no 95 », juin 1976;

Avec Cyril Aldred, Jean-Philippe Lauer, Jean Leclant et Jean Vercoutter, Le temps des pyramides, Paris, Gallimard, coll. « L'univers des formes », 1978.

Avec C. Aldred, P. Barguet, J. Leclant et H.W. Müller, L'empire des conquérants, Paris, Gallimard, coll. « L'univers des formes », 1979.

Avec C. Aldred, François Daumas, et J. Leclant, L'Égypte du crépuscule, Paris, Gallimard, coll. « L'univers des formes », 1980.

Avec J. Vercoutter, Un siècle de fouilles françaises en Égypte 1880-1980, Le Caire, IFAO, 1981.

Un siècle de fouilles françaises en Egypte, Exposition au Palais de Tokyo, Paris, coll. « Archéologia no 155 », juin 1981.

Avec L. Balout et C. Roubet, La momie de Ramsès II, Paris, Museum national d'histoire naturelle, 1985.

Le grand Pharaon Ramsès II et son Temps, Montréal, Palais de la Civilisation Montréal, 1985.

Les zélateurs de Mandoulis et les maîtres de Ballana et de Qustul, Le Caire, IFAO, coll. « Mélanges Gamal Eddin Mokhtar », 1985.

La femme au temps des pharaons, Stock, 1986 et 2001, Prix Diane-Potier-Boès 1988.

La Vallée des Reines retrouvera-t-elle sa splendeur passée ?, Paris, coll. « Archéologia no 209 », janvier 1986.

Le réveil des Temples de Nubie, Paris, coll. « Archéologia no 300 », avril 1990.

La grande Nubiade ou le parcours d'une égyptologue, Paris, Stock, 1992, 538 p. (ISBN 2-7242-7128-9). Prix Saint-Simon 1992.

La tombe de Nofrétari, Paris, coll. « Archéologia no 291 », 1993.

Le zodiaque de pharaon, coll. « Archéologia no 292 », juillet-août 1993.

À propos de la nouvelle tombe de la Vallée des Rois, Paris, coll. « Archéologia no 314 », 1995, p. 4-6.

Amours et fureurs de la lointaine, Stock, 1995.

Ramsès II, la jeunesse d'un prince surdoué, Paris, coll. « Archéologia no 329 », décembre 1996.

Ramsès II, la véritable histoire [détail des éditions].

Toutânkhamon, Pygmalion, 1999.

Le secret des temples de la Nubie, Stock, 1999.

Parlons de Ramsès, Paris, coll. « Archéologia no 354 », mars 1999.

La reine mystérieuse, Paris, Pygmalion, 2002, 501 p. (ISBN 2-7028-7078-3).

Sous le regard des dieux, Albin Michel, 2003.

Symboles de l'Égypte, Desclée de Brouwer, 2004.

Le fabuleux héritage de l'Égypte, Télémaque, 2004.

Le secret des découvertes, Télémaque, 2006.

No one in this wiki is qualified to assert that Mrs. Desroches Noblecourt would not be reliable and that she wouldn't be reliable in giving any information to whatever weekly, French or American.

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ten Commandments, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dewritech (talk) 12:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I'v just added this on Euryalus' talk page:

APOLOGY

Dear Euryalus, after having been surprised by your term "dramatic", I thought over this reaction, to conclude that you must be Jewish and opposed to the thesis that the Hebrews were mere Egyptians. So I was wrong to speak of French phobia; it is Israel philia. Therefore, the fact - that may not be called a thesis - that the last six commandments are excerpted from the Negative confession shocks your sensitivity. Please, consider that an encyclopedia must tell the truth, however unpleasant to some it may be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.175.32.124 (talk) 09:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

June 2022 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sandrine Rousseau, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kvoou ❯❯❯ Talk 13:50, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I agree with Kvoou. Your last edit to Sandrine Rousseau is just original research ("an interesting detail" reflects your opinion about Sandrine Rousseau and is not a factual statement. PAC2 (talk) 21:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply