August 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Plessy v. Ferguson, because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Lugia2453 (talk) 16:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Plessy v. Ferguson with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2013 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Structure of the Earth‎‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2014 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Guy Laliberté. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Dave Dial (talk) 18:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to George Soros with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Guy Laliberté. —C.Fred (talk) 21:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Guy Laliberté. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Favonian (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm 1989. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wilford Leach, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MCMLXXXIX 18:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.