August 2022

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making legal threats or taking legal action.
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — JJMC89(T·C) 06:37, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Diagolon

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

168.149.230.243 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

being blocked by editors for removing slanderous and untrue information is not a reason to be blocked. Further more, slander and libel are federal crimes in Canada and these editors will be prosecuted by the law. 168.149.230.243 (talk) 06:46, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Slander and Libel

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

168.149.230.243 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

any editor involved in this, from putting the information back up, to the user who placed a block on me, will be taken to court and sued for slander and libel. I do not care what wikipedia says the rule is. You are personally responsible for making false information available to the public and will be prosecuted as such. This is not negotiable. There are black, asian, native and sikh members of Diagolon and they will smile in a court room and tell the judge how being called "a white supremacist organization" has irreparably damaged their reputation. You think the court is going to side with you? The source you list has already been sued multiple times for libel, slander, and publishing flase information. We are currently in court with AntiHate, as are several other people for the same reasoning.

Decline reason:

Since you have doubled down on your legal threats, I have lengthened the block. You can pursue your grievances in Canadian courts or on Wikipedia, but not both. 331dot (talk) 08:18, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.