June 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in TV on the Radio, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Maximum Balloon info should 1) go on David Andrew Sitek 2) be written in neutral tone, and 3) the links cited as refs. Wwwhatsup (talk) 00:39, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page List of demigods has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. L Kensington (talkcontribs) 05:41, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Ventnor City, New Jersey, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 20:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

May 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Auric. I wanted to let you know that your recent contributions to Tea bag (sexual act) have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Auric talk 00:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicole Ehrlich concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicole Ehrlich, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maureen Kenny concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maureen Kenny, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maureen Kenny edit

 

Hello 167.167.40.2. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Maureen Kenny".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maureen Kenny}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm TBloemink. I noticed that you recently removed some content from PJ (musician) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TBloemink talk 21:54, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm ToBeFree. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Barker code seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:20, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Poppy talk page edit

Hi. I think your edits are good ones, and dividing the crowded section seems correct. Please talk page the suggestions at the article, reverting will just end up in an edit war. Will support the idea there, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:31, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Wesoree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Joe's Garage have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 18:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply