Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Binghamton shootings. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

November 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vithura may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[St. Mary's Malankara Catholic Church Vithura

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

December 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tom Lister, Jr. has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm Donner60. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sultanate of Sulu seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 23:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sabah. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 23:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Dolfinz1972 (talk) 00:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Win98fan (talk) 23:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, History of Goa, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:49, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

I thought I did give reference. Sorry - I will try again. It's important to have correct information there. thanks 162.119.128.140 (talk) 22:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Materialscientist (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to History of Goa. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply